I'd say that's pretty irrelevant because I'm sure most of the owners who would benefit would want the Lakers to pay that tax.
Like the Yankees/Red Sox in baseball
Coming from the guy who's team benefited most from the trade, that's pretty hypocritical. I don't really care that much about the NBA. Hell, I don't even really think this should have been veto'd but the reason it was is valid.
The Hornets get quantity over quality. For a team that, as you say...
Mexi, that's like saying when Boston traded for Garnett and Allen that they had no PG...doesn't always matter and doesn't take away from what happened.
Makes me wonder if Tebow realizes that having another man on his dick is still gay...don't think his Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, would look too kindly on that.
BTW that's more a shot at Bayless than Tebow...Tim's just caught in the crossfire.
sounds like the AL East lol
I'm honestly not as adamantly against it as a lot of fans seem to be. I like the idea of two teams from the same conference being able to play for the Cup. It's like the old days.
Keep in mind though that this would have to be passed by the NHLPA so it might not...
I hated when he left but I'm sad that he kept getting hurt and couldn't continue to play at the level he was truly capable of.
If he's not a first ballot HOF then MLB can suck it