- Thread starter
- #1
Paulius
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2015
- Messages
- 40,727
- Reaction score
- 432
Discuss.
What's your reasoning to that?brett05 said:Larry was not a PF.
Why the fuck are you referencing his college position in your argument?bosoxlover12 said:What's your reasoning to that?
He was a PF in his three years at Indiana State. He was the starting PF for the first six seasons of his career in his twelve year career, and that only changed when McHale was deemed good enough to trade away Ced' Maxwell. And still, he didn't play like a traditional SF like Dominique -- he played like a PF. If he were in today's league, he wouldn't be a SF either.
Larry Bird was never listed by the team as a SF, but just as a forward. He's only categorized as a SF because he could hit threes and McHale couldn't. Bird shouldn't be grouped with guys like Nique and Lebron and VC -- he should be grouped with Dirk and KG
because he never played SF in college. he played PF until he was 29 years oldCameronCrazy06 said:Why the fuck are you referencing his college position in your argument?
he was never a pf really either. he was a combo forward, but gets grouped as a sf because he's the smallest of mchale and parish. but his play style is far closer to garnett&dirk than any wing. boston ran a 3 big, two guard line in the 80snolafan33 said:I don't think I've ever heard anyone say Bird was a PF. His best years came at SF.
College position is completely irrelevant to any argument of what position he played in the NBA.bosoxlover12 said:because he never played SF in college. he played PF until he was 29 years old
Have you watched the Spurs...? In recent years he has played more of the 5 but up until they lost Splitter he was a PF hahaMexi said:I kinda feel the same way about tim duncan being a super tweener like bosox lists bird
Tim hasnt really played PF since Robinson retired