- Joined
- Jun 11, 2008
- Messages
- 67,842
- Reaction score
- 2,208
So the Celtics can push the Cavs to six games with no advantage and no star, but a Pelicans or Thunder team with each having a megastar is a guaranteed sweep?
They could always win one and the media will hype up "Boston Pride" and all that nonsense. But that's best case scenario. NO could take GSW to 6 best case if AD balls out and Jrue returns to full form and GSW goes cold once or twicebuzzy said:Honestly think C's would be an easy sweep for Cleveland.
Playoff LeBron is a different beast. He doesn't want to play unnecessary games. He's gonna get shit done.
nolafan33 said:
Because there is still an entire quarter of basketball that the Pelicans play a game without AD, a ton can happen in 12+ minutes of action.
and I don't know where this team would be if you could turn injuries off. I will say this, when a team loses a player or multiple players, there are things the coaching staff can do to minimize the loss. The one thing that no coach can do, I don't care how good he is, is make up for a lack of continuity. That is the least talked about thing in basketball, history suggests that if you take an average or slightly above average team and give them exceptional health then that team will play more like an elite team than the average team they are. I think that's some of what you are seeing with Atlanta this season, their top 5 guys have missed just 30 games this season. Look at Portland last year, their starting 5 missed just 13 games. Last season their starting 5 played nearly 1700 minutes together, the Pelicans starting five will likely not even get to 200 this season. Continuity is so important. It's why you won't ever hear me feel sorry for OKC this year, they've had exceptional health ever since moving to OKC, I would kill for it. In their first playoff season their top 8 guys missed a combined 13 games. Without the health they've had, they wouldn't be the team we know today. So I don't know, I'd definitely take them over Dallas at full health. You can only go off what you know. Over two seasons this team has proven to be a top offense in the league when we have Jrue, Gordon, Reke, Anderson, and Davis healthy. Since the addition of Pondexter and Cole the team has improved to about average defensively. Add Jrue? I don't know. I think a team of Jrue, Gordon, Pondexter, Davis, Asik, Evans, Anderson, Cole, and Ajinca could be damn good if they ever get to play together. Good compliment of shooters, guys who can get to the rim, passers, perimeter defenders, interior defenders, and so on. Lots of talent.
That's a given, the Thunder are better than everyone in front of them minus maybe GS and SA, and even that may be arguable lolCameronCrazy06 said:And we've both already agreed to the fact that the Thunder are much better than the Pelicans when healthy.
it's good for you that until recently greg monroe hardly missed games lolnolafan33 said:That's a given, the Thunder are better than everyone in front of them minus maybe GS and SA, and even that may be arguable lol
Though I will say, if this Pels team can get say 40-50 games together, they can compete with that second group of West teams imo. But they need to develop some continuity first.