--Official Trade/Transaction Thread--

[snipezo]

Harris to LA? lol. If they get him just give them the Championship already lol.

 

[RipCity32]

"So might the Lakers be a spot for Harris?"

What does that even mean? Why the Lakers and not any other team in the league lol.
Never going to happen.

 

[Mexi]

it says they inquired

NJ probably said no.
i want to sound more concrete, but you never know. he is available
i just dont think the lakers have what it takes. unless they take a bad contract or something?

 

[RipCity32]

I literally can't think of anything the Nets would want from the Lakers. That the Lakers would give away at least.

 

[Mexi]

neither can i

i dont think they want Farmar
i dont think they're that desperate for more expirings (Farmar and Morrison is 6M expiring)

if they do get John Wall during the draft, THEN you can go trade Harris

idk. we've been surprised before

what did the Bucks get for Jefferson? trash.

 

[.GR]

Harris will be a King. Watch.

 

[.GR]

The Sacramento Kings continue to insist that Kevin Martin is not going to be made available to interested teams before the Feb. 18 trading deadline.

The Mavericks, according to NBA front-office sources, continue to tell the Kings that they want a call back if that stance changes.

Sources close to the situation told ESPN.com that Dallas -- reluctant until recently to make Josh Howard available in trade discussions -- is prepared to part with the struggling former All-Star swingman in a deal for Martin.

Kevin Martin
Rocky Widner/NBAE/Getty ImagesKevin Martin
The Kings, though, have been telling teams that they are not ready to field offers for Martin, determined to give his fledging backcourt partnership with hot-shot rookie Tyreke Evans an extended period of evaluation.

If that position changes between now and the Feb. 18 trading deadline, Dallas is expected to be one of the league's most determined Martin suitors.

The Sacramento Bee's Sam Amick recently listed Houston, Toronto, Cleveland and Phoenix as teams tracking Martin.

It remains to be seen whether the Kings will bow to that interest in the next few weeks or if they’ll become more open to the idea of trading Martin if they hear that they can also shed another one of their long-term contracts -- such as Andres Nocioni or Beno Udrih -- in the process.

One hypothetical trade scenario could see Dallas offer Howard, Drew Gooden, J.J. Barea and cash to the Kings for Martin and Nocioni. That, however, is a lot of long-term salary for the Mavs to add. It's also not known if a combination of payroll relief, Barea and the opportunity to resurrect Howard's career would ultimately be enough to satisfy Sacramento even if Dallas was willing to take on Nocioni as well.

Such a swap, though, would raise the possibility of the Mavs reacquiring Gooden. If the Kings waived him immediately, Gooden could re-sign with Dallas as long as he waited 30 days after his release instead of signing elsewhere, just as Antonio McDyess did last season with Detroit.

This would be stupid. Another three? That'd leave Francisco Garcia, Omri Casspi, Donte Greene and Andris Nocioni if he wasn't traded all at the three without picking up a young frontcourt player or point.

 

[.GR]

The Dallas Mavericks are watching Kevin Martin's situation with the Sacramento Kings and are willing to trade Josh Howard for Martin.

Marc Stein, writing for ESPNDallas.com writes: "Sources close to the situation told ESPN.com that Dallas -- reluctant until recently to make Josh Howard available in trade discussions -- is prepared to part with the struggling former All-Star swingman in a deal for Martin. The Kings, though, have been telling teams that they are not ready to field offers for Martin, determined to give his fledging backcourt partnership with hot-shot rookie Tyreke Evans an extended period of evaluation."

 

[RipCity32]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but personally I think Martin is much much better than Howard.

 

[.GR]

Yeah, and what would be the point in that? Isn't this so we can move Evans to SG? Who plays point? I'm guesding IF we trade Martin it will be for a frontcourt player or a point. Not another SF.

 

[MapleLeaf]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but personally I think Martin is much much better than Howard.

Josh Howard is the worst player on the Mavericks roster this year

 

[cruzg24]

After recent discussions with Amar’e Stoudemire’s agent that didn’t appear to destine a contract extension, the Phoenix Suns have increased their efforts to trade the All-Star forward, league sources told Yahoo! Sports on Sunday night.

League executives say the Suns have become more active initiating talks over the past few days, and believe the franchise will take the best offer for Stoudemire before the Feb. 18 trade deadline. The Chicago Bulls, Miami Heat, Philadelphia 76ers, New Jersey Nets and Detroit Pistons are among multiple teams that have a strong interest in Stoudemire, sources say. The Arizona Republic reported Sunday night that the Golden State Warriors and Cleveland Cavaliers have also inquired about Stoudemire.

Source: yahoo.com

Interesting, the Knicks should try to get Amare and reunite him with Dantoni.

 

[elcheato]

Why are we inquiring on Amare lol, we don't have anything to give.

Unless the Suns are for certain Amare is leaving, and that no other big name team offers more then us.

 

[RipCity32]

I'd give up basically anyone on the team for Amare, maybe even Stuckey.
Dumars doesn't have the balls though, so me and many Pistons' fans aren't getting their hopes up.

 

[elcheato]

lol last year at the deadline their was a 644 page thread on a cavs forum about Amare.

 

[RipCity32]

lol last year at the deadline their was a 644 page thread on a cavs forum about Amare.

I think there was that many threads about Pistons rumors at the deadline here lmao.

 

[MapleLeaf]

IDK why we're going after Kevin Martin, he's basically a taller jason terry

I'd rather go after someone like Caron Butler

 

[dez]

With the trade deadline approaching, the New York Knicks may once again make a move to clear up cap space for the now infamous 2010 off-season. Jared Jeffries, who is making $6.47M this season and $6.88M next season, was deemed virtually unmovable at the beginning of the season. New York, however, is in position to grab the last playoff spot in the Eastern Conference and the defensive prowess of Jeffries has played a large role in helping the Knicks get to where they are now.

Think back to who the New York Knicks were last year. Granted, they still aren’t anybody’s version of the 2004 Detroit Pistons, but they can actually D up every now and then. They rank 20th in defensive rating at 108.7 points allowed per 100 possessions, a subtle improvement from their 23rd ranked 110.8 points allowed per 100 possessions of 08-09.

Who do you put on Chris Paul? Dirk Nowitzki? The Knicks can actually put Jeffries on Paul one night and Nowitzki the next. He’s a versatile defensive specialist that can guard point guards, wings of various sizes and power forwards; there’s legitimate value in that for a championship contender looking to strengthen their bench. If you’re the Lakers in the playoffs and you’re worried Derek Fisher can’t stay in front of Steve Nash all night, have Jeffries pester him. His box score is far from sexy, but if you’ve had the chance to watch him annoy opponents you know his importance.

Jeffries doesn’t have the shooting abilities of Shane Battier, but his influence defensively is similar. The Knicks give up nearly eight fewer points per 100 possessions when Jeffries is on the floor than when he is sitting.

Now, there’s even a growing sentiment that Jeffries is too valuable for New York to trade away for additional long-coveted cap space. Sticking to the original script for Donnie Walsh, however, let’s take a look at possible trade partners.

The criteria here is simple: New York will be looking for an expiring contract, while the trade partner must be involved in the playoff race. Out of the 19 possible teams, 11 were automatically disqualified based on needs, lack of matching salaries or their own need for cap space next season.

Utah Jazz: Kyle Korver ($5.16M)

Korver has seemed to have lost playing time since his return from a knee injury recently. Mike D’Antoni’s Knicks could also use another 3-point shooter in their ranks. The Knicks take a huge hit defensively of course, and while the Jazz may not love the idea of taking on additional salary next season, the trade has the potential to give them a better pick in this year’s draft as they own New York’s selection. It’s a potential win/win situation for the Jazz.

Los Angeles Lakers: Adam Morrison ($5.26M)

Morrison serves mostly as a pawn in this trade. He rarely sees the court with the Lakers and I can’t see the Knicks working him into their rotation either, but it serves its main purpose and that’s getting Jeffries out of New York. I don’t think you’ll find many LA fans complaining about Jeffries coming off the bench instead of Luke Walton either, especially if he’s the B team defender for someone like Dirk Nowitzki.

Milwaukee Bucks: Luke Ridnour ($6.5M)

A straight-up deal is more of a pipedream than anything else for the Knicks front office. While Brandon Jennings has the starting PG spot locked up for years, don’t expect the Bucks to get rid of their only depth at the position. Ridnour could be the Knicks answer for a legit ball distributor either off the bench or even replacing Chris Duhon as the starter, but I don’t see it happening unless New York added in Nate Robinson. Robinson and Jeffries for Ridnour and Kurt Thomas happens to work financially and would be a good fit for both teams. Robinson, however, would have to approve any deal he’s involved in first.

Ridnour has had an excellent season, perhaps the best of his entire career.

Memphis Grizzles: Steven Hunter ($3.67M)

With just over three million in cap space, the Grizzles have more flexibility than any other team in the league. Memphis is currently a half game out of the 8th playoff spot in the Western Conference. If they think adding Jeffries could help their chances to get in for the first time since the 2005-06 season, then giving up that flexibility may be an option for them. Hunter has been little use to the Grizzles, but D’Antoni could use a shot blocker so perhaps he will find playing time behind David Lee.

San Antonio Spurs: Michael Finley & Matt Bonner ($5.76M)

Bonner is coming back from an injury to his shooting hand and has been struggling as of late, but he was a valuable member of the San Antonio rotation earlier this season. Finley has had more than his fair share of injury problems as well. Jeffries would fit along nicely when the Spurs reserves come in and could spell anyone from Richard Jefferson to Tim Duncan. Bonner, a 3-point threat, would find time in D’Antoni’s system while Finley could be a veteran presence in the Knicks locker room.

Consider everything from here on out a creative stretch to be filed in the unlikely column.

Houston Rockets: Brian Cook & Chuck Hayes ($5,647,750)

Cook is a salary throw in, so we’ll strictly be looking at Hayes and Jeffries. Their games are actually fairly similar and while Jeffries gives you more options on the defensive end, Hayes is a better rebounder. With that said, this is pretty much a wash talent-wise and the Rockets would be foolish to take on the additional salary and years even if one could make the argument that it is a slight upgrade.

Toronto Raptors: Amir Johnson ($3.94M) and Antoine Wright or Rasho Nesterovic

This deal is possible, but more than unlikely. The Raptors are not looking to do the Knicks any favors going into the offseason as they are looking to retain Chris Bosh. Unless they deem that task impossible by the trade deadline, I don’t see them dedicating any more additional dollars to next year now.

I would love any of these deals as long as it gets us expirings lol, cause they played Jeffries all the way up

 

[A.E]

San Antonio now getting their name out there as a potential suitor for Amare.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=Apug...o&type=lgns

 

[.GR]

Several teams have been thrown out as potential suitors for Amare Stoudemire, but one we haven't really heard yet is the Sacramento Kings. And that's for good reason.

Though Sacramento could conceivably covet Stoudemire because they could use a scorer up front (they did consider such a trade last year), teams are trying to get a guarantee he'll re-sign with them before pulling the trigger on a trade.

And that's not in the cards for the Kings, according to Sam Amick of the Sacramento Bee.

"Two sources close to the eight-year player said it would be 'highly unlikely' he would re-sign as a free agent this summer if traded to Sacramento, with his preference to play with a pass-first point guard for a team closer to being in the playoffs than the Kings," he writes.

We better not even attempt to acquire him since I'm positive he wouldn't resign.