- Joined
- Sep 25, 2009
- Messages
- 25,700
- Reaction score
- 771
I dunno but one of the guys from yahoo sports is getting that from a source.
Meh, two more years isn't all that bad I guess.stuckey isnt on that bad of a contract..
I don't think you know what you're talking about. Lillard's assists numbers are similar if not better than Kemba's and Knight's, so I don't know where you get that they're both better passers. Had Lillard played for a school where he wasn't needed to score as much, his assist #s probably would have been much higher than both of them anyways, but they're about the same as is.All of them are better defenders, better floor generals, better passers.
Like I said, you drastically overrate an unproven one trick pony.
Does that sound like a floor general to you? Kemba was obviously a great leader in college but Knight? Stop it.Not a pure point guard ... Ball handling ability needs a lot of work. His dribble is too high and will be easy to pick unless he improves upon it ... Passing ability is respectable, but not intuitive ... Very turnover prone, especially when trying to create for others ...
its not really. the market is bad.Meh, two more years isn't all that bad I guess.
But 8.5M a year for a guy of his caliber is hilariously bad.
No he isn't lol. You literally sound like you don't have the first clue what you are talking about.My point is that Lillard is a better passer than both of them, better floor general than Knight, better defender than Knight, better shooter/scorer than both. He'd probably have been picked #7 if you want specifics.
I'd agree, but it's the Bobcats so.There is no way the Bobcats trade #2 for Rudy Gay.