NBA rumors and hearsay

bosoxlover12

We're Onto Cincinnati
ADMIN
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
36,768
Reaction score
1,153
Plus as I said before, I doubt we're going to trade for Russ anyways. We're far more likely to deal for Blake
 

Pugz

#ForPaul
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
127,713
Reaction score
2,100
i still think hes la or boston bound, and if he hits free agency its likely he goes to la.

i dont think winning is as important as people may think. he wants to be the guy.
 

buzzy

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Messages
20,671
Reaction score
1,172
Well he can literally be the guyest of guys in Oklahoma. He'll never be a top 5 Laker, but if he re-signs he'll instantly be the best/most important player in Thunder history.
 

BwareDWare94

Where were you when the world stopped turning?
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
8,989
Reaction score
140
Minnesota should not, under any circumstances, package Wiggins and Lavine for Westbrook, even if he agrees to resign. Two under 25 players with ridiculous ceilings has too much potential to move.
 

bosoxlover12

We're Onto Cincinnati
ADMIN
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
36,768
Reaction score
1,153
Papa Pugzo said:
i still think hes la or boston bound, and if he hits free agency its likely he goes to la.

i dont think winning is as important as people may think. he wants to be the guy.
oh, he definitely would not sign with us as a UFA. Our only shot for him is by trading for him while he's under contract, and then trying to sign him
 
And I disagree with the 2nd part. Yeah he wants to be The Guy, but he's incredibly competitive. He's the closest competitor we've had since Prime Kobe. He absolutely wants to win. I really don't see him signing in LA without confirmation from another player like Blake that he's following Russ there.
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
BwareDWare94 said:
Minnesota should not, under any circumstances, package Wiggins and Lavine for Westbrook, even if he agrees to resign. Two under 25 players with ridiculous ceilings has too much potential to move.
and neither has potential to be a top 5 player in the league :kobe:
 

BNC

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
4,115
Reaction score
87
elcheato said:
and neither has potential to be a top 5 player in the league :kobe:
And Westbrook is 27 with a game that is going to age terribly
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
BNC said:
And Westbrook is 27 with a game that is going to age terribly
and that is not something that is worth worrying about when he is 27
 

jonathanlambert33

P-ROBlem
Staff member
Global Moderator
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
31,527
Reaction score
876
The Wolves making a push for Westbrook would be stupid. They're on a good path and they don't need to diverge from it, that's how you fuck things up. Not to mention historically, when KAT hits his peak, Russell will be like 35 years old. So what's the point?
 

BNC

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
4,115
Reaction score
87
elcheato said:
and that is not something that is worth worrying about when he is 27
It is when the future of you franchise is 20 years old
 

BNC

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
4,115
Reaction score
87
Rushing to contend is how you end up with the disaster that is the Pelicans roster or the first LeBron era Cavs, it's misguided and doesn't end well
 

jonathanlambert33

P-ROBlem
Staff member
Global Moderator
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
31,527
Reaction score
876
BNC said:
Rushing to contend is how you end up with the disaster that is the Pelicans roster or the first LeBron era Cavs, it's misguided and doesn't end well
I don't think the Pelicans were trying to contend, but I do agree.
 

bosoxlover12

We're Onto Cincinnati
ADMIN
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
36,768
Reaction score
1,153
BNC said:
Rushing to contend is how you end up with the disaster that is the Pelicans roster or the first LeBron era Cavs, it's misguided and doesn't end well
Rushing to contend? Lebron dragged a talentless team to the playoffs for five years, in which when he left (alongside 12ppg Shaq and Delonte West and that's basically it) the team dropped from 61 wins to 19. It's not Cleveland's fault that Lebron was so freaking talented that they couldn't get additional talent.
 
Jordan's Bulls had the 11th, 9th, 5th, and 10th picks in the 3 drafts after Jordan's rookie year. Durant's Thunder/Sonics had the 4th and 3rd picks in 2 drafts after KD's rookie year.
 
Cleveland had the 10th and 25th picks in the 4 drafts after Lebron's rookie year. Lebron got no help from a shitty franchise that didn't put any talent around him.
 

Paulius

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2015
Messages
40,727
Reaction score
432
bosoxlover12 said:
Simply put, these are teams I think Russ would be possibly interested in a trade, based on solely the location or the talent (not mutually exclusive):
 
Boston
Golden State
Miami
Cleveland
LA Clippers
LA Lakers
Minnesota
New York
Dallas
Houston
San Antonio
Chicago
Brooklyn
 
 
I would eliminate Brooklyn, Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, and Golden State from that list from having essentially no trading assets. Chicago, Cleveland, and the Clippers go in to the next group of having almost no trade assets, and the assets they have wouldn't make sense for a trade (Butler, Kyrie, CP3).
 
That leaves New York, Minnesota, LA Lakers, Miami, and Boston as venues. I really don't see Westbrook wanting to play in Minnesota, even though they have the most to trade potentially. The Knicks have one asset in Porzingis, and I've heard they really don't want to move him at all. I would do it if I were them, but I can fully understand not wanting to trade Kristaps. Outside of that they have nothing. The Lakers have assets, but their team sucks. Why would Westbrook want to play where the third best player might just be Jordan Clarkson or Julius Randle. Miami has a really good asset in Winslow... but almost nothing else.
 
 
From these five teams, this is what I would value for the deals to be:
 
Minnesota: F Wiggins, G Dunn, G LaVine, C Aldrich
Miami: G Dragic, F Winslow, G Richardson, 2017 MIA 1st
Los Angeles: G Russell, F Randle, F Ingram, G Calderon
New York: G Rose, F Porzingis (Knicks would also receive back Singler and Morrow)
Boston: G Bradley, G Smart, F Brown, G Hunter, G Young, 2017 BKN 1st, 2018 BKN 1st
 
From the deals alone, I'd rank it MIN, LA, NY, BOS, MIA, with maybe BOS and NY switched. But again, none of these deals get even offered without an extension or the assurance of signing in Free Agency. So of these teams, do you really think Westbrook would sign long term in Minnesota? I'd think he'd rather re-sign in OKC than do that. LA? Sure its a great market, but so is Miami/Boston/NY and that Lakers team would still be trash. I don't see it. 
 
You cannot undersell the value of the 2017 1st rounder. For the past few years, that pick has been the highest valued asset the Celtics have had (over the 2016 1st) because the #9 pick next year could have gone #3 in this year. I would also personally think that Jackson/Giles/Tatum is on the same tier, if not higher, than Simmons and Ingram. Y'all mock Marcus Smart a ton, despite being a star defender in his second year of play, but he might be the fifth best asset received by OKC in that deal. Brooklyn isn't getting better any time soon, and Boston has two more years of their picks to trade away for talent.
Golden state second? Lol its not Russ to go ahead and follow KD like that to the greatest team ever and take sucha shortcut. Russ is definetly not interested in gs, he does his thing

And another thing, IT playing the 2 if russ gets to boston? You think thats a good idea?
 

bosoxlover12

We're Onto Cincinnati
ADMIN
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
36,768
Reaction score
1,153
#2 SG of all time #24 said:
Golden state second? Lol its not Russ to go ahead and follow KD like that to the greatest team ever and take sucha shortcut. Russ is definetly not interested in gs, he does his thing

And another thing, IT playing the 2 if russ gets to boston? You think thats a good idea?
It wasn't in order -- just a list of team names
 
And Isaiah would be used the same way we use him now defensively with Bradley.
Play Cleveland? Isaiah on Shumpert and Russ on Kyrie. Play Houston? Isaiah on Beverley and Russ on Harden.
 
And Isaiah can surely play off-ball on offense, with some on-ball duties
 

Paulius

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2015
Messages
40,727
Reaction score
432
Either way, whatever happens, i think hes going to the knicks next summer regardless. They got rose for the last year, then that pg position is wide open. Knicks if healthy, could do some damage
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
bosoxlover12 said:
It wasn't in order -- just a list of team names
 
And Isaiah would be used the same way we use him now defensively with Bradley.
Play Cleveland? Isaiah on Shumpert and Russ on Kyrie. Play Houston? Isaiah on Beverley and Russ on Harden.
 
And Isaiah can surely play off-ball on offense, with some on-ball duties
If only Shumpert was actually the starter. 
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
BNC said:
Rushing to contend is how you end up with the disaster that is the Pelicans roster or the first LeBron era Cavs, it's misguided and doesn't end well
I wouldn't call it rushing to contend. The first Cavs era and the current Pelicans roster could only dream of having a Westbrook caliber player next to their young franchise star. 
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top