- Joined
- Aug 16, 2010
- Messages
- 36,768
- Reaction score
- 1,153
Plus as I said before, I doubt we're going to trade for Russ anyways. We're far more likely to deal for Blake
oh, he definitely would not sign with us as a UFA. Our only shot for him is by trading for him while he's under contract, and then trying to sign himPapa Pugzo said:i still think hes la or boston bound, and if he hits free agency its likely he goes to la.
i dont think winning is as important as people may think. he wants to be the guy.
and neither has potential to be a top 5 player in the league :kobe:BwareDWare94 said:Minnesota should not, under any circumstances, package Wiggins and Lavine for Westbrook, even if he agrees to resign. Two under 25 players with ridiculous ceilings has too much potential to move.
And Westbrook is 27 with a game that is going to age terriblyelcheato said:and neither has potential to be a top 5 player in the league :kobe:
and that is not something that is worth worrying about when he is 27BNC said:And Westbrook is 27 with a game that is going to age terribly
It is when the future of you franchise is 20 years oldelcheato said:and that is not something that is worth worrying about when he is 27
I don't think the Pelicans were trying to contend, but I do agree.BNC said:Rushing to contend is how you end up with the disaster that is the Pelicans roster or the first LeBron era Cavs, it's misguided and doesn't end well
Rushing to contend? Lebron dragged a talentless team to the playoffs for five years, in which when he left (alongside 12ppg Shaq and Delonte West and that's basically it) the team dropped from 61 wins to 19. It's not Cleveland's fault that Lebron was so freaking talented that they couldn't get additional talent.BNC said:Rushing to contend is how you end up with the disaster that is the Pelicans roster or the first LeBron era Cavs, it's misguided and doesn't end well
Golden state second? Lol its not Russ to go ahead and follow KD like that to the greatest team ever and take sucha shortcut. Russ is definetly not interested in gs, he does his thingbosoxlover12 said:Simply put, these are teams I think Russ would be possibly interested in a trade, based on solely the location or the talent (not mutually exclusive):
Boston
Golden State
Miami
Cleveland
LA Clippers
LA Lakers
Minnesota
New York
Dallas
Houston
San Antonio
Chicago
Brooklyn
I would eliminate Brooklyn, Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, and Golden State from that list from having essentially no trading assets. Chicago, Cleveland, and the Clippers go in to the next group of having almost no trade assets, and the assets they have wouldn't make sense for a trade (Butler, Kyrie, CP3).
That leaves New York, Minnesota, LA Lakers, Miami, and Boston as venues. I really don't see Westbrook wanting to play in Minnesota, even though they have the most to trade potentially. The Knicks have one asset in Porzingis, and I've heard they really don't want to move him at all. I would do it if I were them, but I can fully understand not wanting to trade Kristaps. Outside of that they have nothing. The Lakers have assets, but their team sucks. Why would Westbrook want to play where the third best player might just be Jordan Clarkson or Julius Randle. Miami has a really good asset in Winslow... but almost nothing else.
From these five teams, this is what I would value for the deals to be:
Minnesota: F Wiggins, G Dunn, G LaVine, C Aldrich
Miami: G Dragic, F Winslow, G Richardson, 2017 MIA 1st
Los Angeles: G Russell, F Randle, F Ingram, G Calderon
New York: G Rose, F Porzingis (Knicks would also receive back Singler and Morrow)
Boston: G Bradley, G Smart, F Brown, G Hunter, G Young, 2017 BKN 1st, 2018 BKN 1st
From the deals alone, I'd rank it MIN, LA, NY, BOS, MIA, with maybe BOS and NY switched. But again, none of these deals get even offered without an extension or the assurance of signing in Free Agency. So of these teams, do you really think Westbrook would sign long term in Minnesota? I'd think he'd rather re-sign in OKC than do that. LA? Sure its a great market, but so is Miami/Boston/NY and that Lakers team would still be trash. I don't see it.
You cannot undersell the value of the 2017 1st rounder. For the past few years, that pick has been the highest valued asset the Celtics have had (over the 2016 1st) because the #9 pick next year could have gone #3 in this year. I would also personally think that Jackson/Giles/Tatum is on the same tier, if not higher, than Simmons and Ingram. Y'all mock Marcus Smart a ton, despite being a star defender in his second year of play, but he might be the fifth best asset received by OKC in that deal. Brooklyn isn't getting better any time soon, and Boston has two more years of their picks to trade away for talent.
It wasn't in order -- just a list of team names#2 SG of all time #24 said:Golden state second? Lol its not Russ to go ahead and follow KD like that to the greatest team ever and take sucha shortcut. Russ is definetly not interested in gs, he does his thing
And another thing, IT playing the 2 if russ gets to boston? You think thats a good idea?
If only Shumpert was actually the starter.bosoxlover12 said:It wasn't in order -- just a list of team names
And Isaiah would be used the same way we use him now defensively with Bradley.
Play Cleveland? Isaiah on Shumpert and Russ on Kyrie. Play Houston? Isaiah on Beverley and Russ on Harden.
And Isaiah can surely play off-ball on offense, with some on-ball duties
I wouldn't call it rushing to contend. The first Cavs era and the current Pelicans roster could only dream of having a Westbrook caliber player next to their young franchise star.BNC said:Rushing to contend is how you end up with the disaster that is the Pelicans roster or the first LeBron era Cavs, it's misguided and doesn't end well