- Thread starter
- #2,621
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Messages
- 127,713
- Reaction score
- 2,100
celtics will win the east.
lol losing "frontcourt depth"Big Poppa said:Just look at those names you just posted above and tell me it isnt sad
Really look
Losing bradley and the frontcourt depth hurts more than you realize i think
And hayward is nice i guess, but hes not special bro. Yall will be good for the regular season, sure get 5-6 more wins but what are you realistically expecting from this squad when it matters?
Just stop and save yourself the effortbosoxlover12 said:lol losing "frontcourt depth"
• Amir was so bad that Boston literally started Gerald Green in several playoff games
• Tyler Zeller has had about five good games in his past 125 games with the Celtics.
• Jonas Jerebko was average as a backup stretch four and thats about it
You're losing Kelly Olynyk, and gaining Aron Baynes and Marcus Morris. Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless you're solely looking for a guy who injures members of the Cavaliers, this is an upgrade in personnel. Plus Zizic is a nice young rookie who's a 7 footer and just averaged 14/12 for David Blatt last year. The frontcourt is probably better, but at worst the same as last year.
Hayward's overrated, but at the same time overratedly underrated. He's one of the most patient wings in the game, and is one of the better distributors at his position. He was statistically in the 95th Percentile in scoring efficiency coming off of screens last year, and he's an above average defender and not a liability
Only area Celtics downgrade is Avery Bradley's defense to guard Kyrie. But the Cavs were the only team where Bradley guards the point guard regularly -- against every other team IT still guards the point guard (Wall, Curry, etc). And if there is a situation where IT is simply way too weak to guard his matchup, we can always bring in Smart for his lockdown defense and now the offense won't fully stagnate since Hayward can actually run an offense. This is a clearly better team than last year's team, and we can now have two former #3 picks practice every day with an All Star forward as their matchup to improve their game.
And yall will regret itbosoxlover12 said:As for Fultz, one would think that if Stevens didn't have an issue with Fultz that he would have gone #1, no? It's not like Ainge was the only one that didn't like Fultz -- clearly the coach didn't want to work with Fultz either
maybe. I trust brad that fultz isn't the guy.Big Poppa said:And yall will regret it
You're right for sure. Time will tell how it all plays outbosoxlover12 said:maybe. I trust brad that fultz isn't the guy.
everyone was saying boston should have taken dunn over jaylen last year, and we rightfully so did not. obviously we all value Fultz higher than those others but its not unlike a top pick to fail. Beasley surely didn't live up to the hype he at one point had. MKG went 2nd in a draft with Bradley Beal and Damian Lillard. It doesn't look great now, but lets not judge the trade until the rookies really do anything
So if your mindset is already set to lose to lebron in the ecf, and prolly lose to him the next however many years, why do you want the Celtics to keep IT and pay him all that money if it wont change a thing?!?bosoxlover12 said:
learn to read first
Exactly. This proves even more that its time to build a young power house for an era after bron with all these assets and trade of guys like horford IT AND GET EVEN MORE ASSETS while theyre not too old and still have value, especially horfordbosoxlover12 said:yup. and lets also not factor in that boston did get another valuable pick with tatum too. for all we know next year boston has the first two picks in the draft, and the prospects are better than this years, and therefore that #2 pick and Tatum would be a far better value than Fultz any day.
We'll see once the season progresses
not evenBig Poppa said:They dont need to
Bigger cakewalk this year than the last 2