- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Messages
- 34,763
- Reaction score
- 561
Maybe he shouldn't be leading off.
People thought he'd be an MVP candidate this year lolMexi said:Cubs missed on trading Schwarber when his value was undeservedly high
Now he's a platoon dh forced to play lf and hitting less than .200
i never liked thatGMF1991 said:Maybe he shouldn't be leading off.
Pretty sure he's established that at this point. Trout is still the better player, but Bryce is far more marketable than Trout.Teagz said:Bryce Harper is down as fuck. I love it.
He could be the star that baseball needs. He's a great player and he's not a robot like Trout.
Only because Trout cares more about the game than endorsementssnipezo said:Pretty sure he's established that at this point. Trout is still the better player, but Bryce is far more marketable than Trout.
True, but do you think either team lays out $400 million for 10 years?Mexi said:Bryce will be more marketable as a dodger or especially a Yankee
He is just a really boring dude. Great player, best player of our generation, but boring as hellbrett05 said:Only because Trout cares more about the game than endorsements
Yep.elcheato said:He is just a really boring dude. Great player, best player of our generation, but boring as hell
absolutelybrett05 said:True, but do you think either team lays out $400 million for 10 years?
lmaoGMF1991 said:Absolutely mind-blowing that Jose Reyes (hitting .202 in 178 at bats) is batting 2nd in the lineup every day.
i hate the open marketRios said:40 million a season for Harper? That'd be screwed up lol. I would never want my team to offer one player on a 25 man team that... and at that length too. Just not worth it lol.
Mexi said:cmon man
Sold high on kemp and got grandal who is probably the 2nd best nl C behind posey