I know, but you have a better chance of winning a game 5 with your best starter on the mound.Mexi said:Its not a job saver
It was a extend the series at all costs and anything can happen in a winner take all game 5
You have a greater chance of losing a game 4 by throwing your best starter into an unaccustomed high-stress relief role. I have no problem with him in relief, but the timing was bad.
Doesn't make sense to me.
Unless of course, like you mentioned, he would have started Price in game 5. In all honesty, I don't think that was Farrell's thought.