- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Messages
- 34,763
- Reaction score
- 561
Please explain how they got lucky.
Yes complain about the playoffs. Why is admitting being wrong so hard? Anyone?PWNdroia said:He maintained it.
Paul Moliter got lucky. If it weren't for a second wild card team, he wouldn't even be in question for manager of the year.
Geez, you don't give up do you? Okay, I was obviously wrong because Molitor won, happy? I just don't have faith that the Twins are that good. They got on a run in the latter part of the year in a division that had only one clear winner. If they were in the AL East, they wouldn't have made it.brett05 said:Yes complain about the playoffs. Why is admitting being wrong so hard? Anyone?
They did matter. Management bailed as you stated and the players left under Molitor played their hearts out and got into the playoffs. That fits the definition of a manager of the year perfectly.PWNdroia said:Geez, you don't give up do you? Okay, I was obviously wrong because Molitor won, happy? I just don't have faith that the Twins are that good. They got on a run in the latter part of the year in a division that had only one clear winner. If they were in the AL East, they wouldn't have made it.
They also had a very easy schedule after July. The only teams they beat above .500 was a Yankees team that was slumping at the time and a three game sweep of Arizona. Other than that, the Indians spanked them and the Twins were able to win several series against the White Sox and Tigers. No surprise there.
They had no intentions of being good, became sellers at the deadline and basically got wild card by default because they beat easy teams the latter part of the season.
Personally, I'd rather give the manager of the year award to a team that actually matters.
Craig Mish of MLB Network Radio on SiriusXM tweets that the Marlins and Giants have discussed second baseman Joe Panik, right-handed pitching prospect Tyler Beede and outfield prospect Chris Shaw. The Giants have also discussed the possibility of taking Dee Gordon back in the deal, which would make some sense with Panik possibly being of interest to Miami. It’s worth noting that Mish doesn’t specifically state that the two sides have talked about a Panik/Beede/Shaw for Stanton and Gordon package. To the contrary, Henry Schulman of the San Francisco Chronicle tweets that he hears that is not the framework of a deal being discussed (nor is it close, according to Schulman). It seems, then, that the two sides are likely discussing multiple scenarios and those names have been involved (likely with others) in various permutations. The Giants reportedly made some type of trade proposal on Friday.
I bet the Giants would like to take Dee Gordon in a potential trade. This sounds like an huuuuuuge reach from Giants beatwriters and their shoddy sources. I have no doubt the Giants are talking to the Marlins but as we all know, San Fran doesn’t have half the King’s ransom Jeter wants in return..ptt81 said:Giants' offer for Stanton
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/11/giancarlo-stanton-trade-rumors-moncay.html
Y'all got another Michael Fulmer for us?GMF1991 said:Mets and Tigers in preliminary trade talks regarding Ian Kinsler.
This is such a Mets move.
All I'm saying is you can't base a manager's success off three months. In my opinion, a bunch of reasons were responsible for the Twins success with the manager being one of the least indicative reasons. Very small sample size and you can't successfully claim it was all because of Molitor.brett05 said:They did matter. Management bailed as you stated and the players left under Molitor played their hearts out and got into the playoffs. That fits the definition of a manager of the year perfectly.
There's no showing you the logic. Oh well.PWNdroia said:All I'm saying is you can't base a manager's success off three months. In my opinion, a bunch of reasons were responsible for the Twins success with the manager being one of the least indicative reasons. Very small sample size and you can't successfully claim it was all because of Molitor.
I'd rather pick a manager who was steady all year from the start, not someone who came off a magic carpet ride.
Ugh.Teagz said:Y'all got another Michael Fulmer for us?
I don't understand why Paul Molitor is the only option to you. I get it that you think he did a good job, but honestly, there are other good managers out there.brett05 said:There's no showing you the logic. Oh well.
That's what I'm trying to say, only you said it better. Thank you.snipezo said:I honestly don't think managers have a big impact on wins and losses anyways. Most of their value comes from people management. If a team is talented enough, that team will more than likely see success no matter who the manager is.