- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Messages
- 127,713
- Reaction score
- 2,100
these fucking flags
You saw Peyton manning last year right? You don't NEED a great quarterback to win in the NFL. The redskins simply have bigger holes to fill than quarterbackelcheato said:Having a QB who is good enough to win some games, but not good enough to have you seriously contend is one of the most frustrating spots to be in. I think that is where Cousins stands.
I'm sold, every team should be trying to acquire QBs similar to Peyton Manning from last year. That's the winning formula that should be replicated.CameronCrazy06 said:You saw Peyton manning last year right? You don't NEED a great quarterback to win in the NFL. The redskins simply have bigger holes to fill than quarterback
CameronCrazy06 said:You saw Peyton manning last year right? You don't NEED a great quarterback to win in the NFL. The redskins simply have bigger holes to fill than quarterback
That's not what I said at all haha. Speaking of you all were in my dream last night. It was me and buzzy vs Jake and Dan in a game of keep away. Dan almost diedelcheato said:I'm sold, every team should be trying to acquire QBs similar to Peyton Manning from last year. That's the winning formula that should be replicated.
tony eason led new england to a super bowl smhMexi said:Is this the first black qb in pats history tho
Im imagining some pretty bummed people watching the game right now lol
Yes, but you are saying you don't need a great QB to win based on last year, which was an anomaly.CameronCrazy06 said:That's not what I said at all haha. Speaking of you all were in my dream last night. It was me and buzzy vs Jake and Dan in a game of keep away. Dan almost died
bosoxlover12 said:tony eason led new england to a super bowl smh
And you equated that to me saying you need a not great QB to win, so that's coolelcheato said:Yes, but you are saying you don't need a great QB to win based on last year, which was an anomaly.
You don't need a great QB to win, but it certainly makes it a hell of a lot easier.
Hurricane Season said:
Are you saying Tony Eason was black?
Your argument is still weird. It's basically ignoring that QB is by far the most important position in the sport. If you don't have someone who is very good/a borderline star, you should still be looking for a QB.CameronCrazy06 said:And you equated that to me saying you need a not great QB to win, so that's cool
i don't know why I thought Eason was black tbh... but I did... smh@meHurricane Season said:
Are you saying Tony Eason was black?
Long snapper is more important IMOelcheato said:Your argument is still weird. It's basically ignoring that QB is by far the most important position in the sport. If you don't have someone who is very good/a borderline star, you should still be looking for a QB.
Doesn't mean you have to dump your current guy, but you definitely should not be satisfied with it.