- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Messages
- 127,713
- Reaction score
- 2,100
it is a stretch to say that because neither will be stars. yea i said it.
I could agree, Wiggins is great but I don't think he will truly ever be a star.Papa Pugzo said:it is a stretch to say that because neither will be stars. yea i said it.
gerald is only missing half a finger manelcheato said:LaVine will not be a star. I don't see anything that separates him from Gerald Green, other than having all his fingers.
i think demar could be considered a star.Mexi said:Is demar considered a star?
I see wiggins as that with a chance for more
Papa Pugzo said:hasnt been cleared for scrimmages though. he can help when hes ready
Let's be fair to Zach--how much do you get to watch him?elcheato said:LaVine will not be a star. I don't see anything that separates him from Gerald Green, other than having all his fingers.
He hasn't been an efficient player so far in his career, he's really not good at creating his own shot consistently, or for others.BwareDWare94 said:Let's be fair to Zach--how much do you get to watch him?
He can score whenever he wants due to a wonderfully developed shooting stroke and excellent elevation.
He's not a great defender but that can be taught and developed, and I see no effort issues on his part. Also, Gerald Green had to fall out of the league and learn how to shoot the damn ball before he was ever a decent rotation player who could explode on any given night. Zach Lavine is 20 (I think) and already on his way.
But he can score whenever he wantsPapa Pugzo said:i think zach has all the tools to become a chucker.