2011 NFL Season Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

WHO-DEY-BENGALS_18

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
16,192
Reaction score
296
Bengals were fucked over several times today. Awful officiating.
I'm none too happy about it. As far as I'm concerned, that was by far worse than the Calvin Johnson play last year. How is that NOT a TD? He never even lost full control of the ball. Had two feet in, ball got over the pi-line and held onto it. I don't know what a catch is anymore, it had a severe outcome on the game, however.
 

Giantmetfan07

Shocking The World
ADMIN
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
34,763
Reaction score
561
NFL used to be able to save themselves in those situations by saying "Receiver has to make 1 Football Move". Then people started asking "what is a football move" and now the NFL has dug themselves a hole.

I agree. It's BS. I havent seen the play but hopefully I can find a Youtube video of it.
 

WHO-DEY-BENGALS_18

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
16,192
Reaction score
296

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
SMFH.


Stop. Now.

Every week now, you've been saying "its the WRs fault doe"

Its not. At this point in time, Gabbert is not good at all. He is the worst starting quarterback in the National Football league.


All this shit about the Jags having a terrible passing attack lies on Gabbert, not the WRs.



Lets look at the Tennessee Titans.

Damian Williams? Nate Washington? Craig Stevens? And Chris "I didnt stay in shape during my holdout so I suck" Johnson?

Jason Hill is better than Williams. Supposedly Wallace is better than Washington, and Deion Branch (which is STILL funny), Lewis> Stevens, MJD>CJ

Yet how come, with this inferior recieving core, Matt Hasselback is 10th in the league in passer rating? Its because Hasselback is a good quarterback, and Gabbert is not.


Gabbert certaintly was not bad today, throwing for 210 yards and not throwing a pick. But he had 0 TD passes, and threw 41 passes on a 53% completion percentage. Colt McCoy, in comparison, threw for 199 yds on 24 passes, at a 71% completion percentage. Cleveland doesnt have great recievers; its just rookie Greg Little pretty much. And Colt isnt a great QB either. Gabbert isnt good right now.

I personally believe that Gabbert is the worst starting QB in the league right now. Worse than Sanchez, worse than Tebow. I even believe that the Jags would be better of with Tebow than with Gabbert.


So go ahead, and try to refute everything I said. Go out and say, we'll get Blackmon and then Gabbert will show how good he is. idc, defenses will double JB, and Gabbert will still suck.
LMFAO, This just goes to show that you haven't even seen Gabbert play lately.

He had 9 dropped passes today including a right in the hands TD catch from Jason Hill with :08 Seconds left in the Game. All the people you listed can get separation, the only person on the Jags that can actually play good enough WR is Marcedes Lewis and ever since he got his fat contract, hes sucked big ole donkey dick. Before the last drive, (you know, when it was like :40 seconds left with 1 timeout, all we could do was pass) Gabbert was 21/28. Yep. Keep hating. What you don't know about Gabbert. He literally has no WR's. Mike Thomas has been non-existent and in the first 9 games of the year Gabbert has the toughest defensive schedule in the league.

Like I said, Keep hating. Today he showed alot of promise and had a couple of good drives with nobody. I didn't say he was great, he's better than Tebow and its Sunday, I've talked about Tebow all damn weekend long and I'm personally tired of talking about him, so I'm not even going to debate that. I have no regrets with selecting Gabbert #10 overall. Once we put the weapons around him, with a new coaching staff.. He'll blossom.. and you'll be looking like the usual dumbfuck everybody else here already thinks you are.
 

WHO-DEY-BENGALS_18

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
16,192
Reaction score
296
I know when he went to the ground the ball moved a tad, but he never lost full control of the ball and it was ruled a TD on the field to begin with...
 

Giantmetfan07

Shocking The World
ADMIN
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
34,763
Reaction score
561
You're right. He still had his hand grasping the ball when he hit the ground. The ball never left his hand. That has gotta be one of the worst calls ever.

It annoys me because I can see it moved JUUUUST a little bit, but there are times when the officials see a TD catch, the receiver hits the ground, ball pops out, and they dont reverse it because the whole rule, like, has no definition. There's no FULL understanding about the rule.

I swear if that happens on a normal play, they call it a catch. But because it's in the endzone for some reason the same rules don't apply.
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
Im also blaming the refs in the Jags loss, shit was just ugly and they were so wrong.
 

Elite

PND SZN
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
18,915
Reaction score
1,162
That was not a catch by Gresham. The ball moved and then he had to roll it into his body on the ground to try and complete the catch.

Good call by the refs.
 

.infamous

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
25,700
Reaction score
771
Stafford had 5 tds and Kevin Smith played well niceeee. Didn't get to see the game though :/ gonna watch it tomorrow since I dvred it.
 

Mooche

New Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
9,904
Reaction score
247
Knox fell and Cutler gets picked. Big momentum swing.
 

Giantmetfan07

Shocking The World
ADMIN
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
34,763
Reaction score
561
BC he already had possession of the ball. Then the ball hits the ground.

Thats like saying a RB runs 25 yards, leaps at the 1 yard line, hits the ground in the endzone and the ball comes out, and its not a TD -- but the way the rules are, it's still a TD. He had possession, hits ground, ball comes out. Its a retarded rule that needs to be fixed.
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
BC he already had possession of the ball. Then the ball hits the ground.

Thats like saying a RB runs 25 yards, leaps at the 1 yard line, hits the ground in the endzone and the ball comes out, and its not a TD -- but the way the rules are, it's still a TD. He had possession, hits ground, ball comes out. Its a retarded rule that needs to be fixed.
The ground can't cause a fumble, you have to have possession all the way through the catch and when you hit the ground for a completion. Totally different then that example. Not to mention once the ball crosses the plane in the end zone as a runner, its a touchdown.
 

Giantmetfan07

Shocking The World
ADMIN
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
34,763
Reaction score
561
I understand what the rules say but the rules suck and need to be changed. And everyone knows it. They used to say You have possession if you make a "football move". But when they couldn't define it, it became a grey area. Nobody knows wtf its supposed to be now. If you have the ball, in 1 hand, you cross the plane, hit the ground, and the ball comes out, that should be a fumble. But the ground cant cause the fumble, so it's fine. Theres no reason why it shouldn't apply the same to receivers as it does running backs.

Its about a difference in opinions as to when the receiver has possession of the ball. In my mind, he had possession of the ball, and in that scenario if the ball comes out, the "ground cannot cause fumble" rule applies.

PS. I have seen at least once this year, the same scenario that Calvin Johnson had last year, and after review they ruled it a TD. So there's not a clear-enough definition of the rule.
 

Giantmetfan07

Shocking The World
ADMIN
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
34,763
Reaction score
561
In fact, he had the ball, took multiple steps, and then hit the ground. I can understand him leaping in the air, catching it, and hitting the ground. But if he took at least 1 step (which he did), that is a "football move" and should be a catch.
 

Giantmetfan07

Shocking The World
ADMIN
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
34,763
Reaction score
561
But even though the fumble for a running back and the catch for a receiver are different, they're the same. If you have control of the ball in your hands, inbounds, you should have possession. it should apply the same to both, and the fact that it doesn't is BS.
 

NV

i'm a mad man
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Messages
5,566
Reaction score
127
Less then an hour till kickoff, big game with the Cowboys winning earlier today.
 

Elite

PND SZN
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
18,915
Reaction score
1,162
Dalton looks like he should be working at Best Buy or some shit when he wears those glasses lol
 

RipCity32

King Of The East
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
88,197
Reaction score
730
Well didn't see the game because of work, but surely happy we got the win.
Seen that Stafford started bad but finished damn near perfect, which is good. And Kevin Smith had a nice ass game too, wouldn't have seen that coming.

Time for Turkey Day. Let's go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 31)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top