I wasn't really advocating for a trade, moreso just stating my opinion. We'll never see anything like that ever being close to happening lol, I just think things might be a little different if they were in different roles.
I think the Thunder have a shot too. Not as great as the other three teams mentioned, but anytime you have two of the top 5 players in the entire league on your team you stand a pretty good chance of winning a title.
Draymond has never not been on a winning team. We have no idea how his attitude could come across in the locker room if wins aren't being checked off on the schedule
I think that you're misinterpreting the part where Draymond is also a trouble maker. He's definitely an attitude problem, but it's managed because: 1. The rest of his team is stellar. 2. They're winning. 3. Their management is lightyears better than Sacramento's. If you take Draymond off of the...
He's experienced, but he's not coming in to play regular minutes haha. Like Stray said, he's been very bad since his achilles injury and it took away his explosiveness (the only thing that made him 'good' in the past). This was a power move because he has been with the Cavs.
Depends on your view of the phrase "contenders" ... Contenders to win a lot of games? Yes. Contenders to win a championship? Probably less so, but yes, I think they're still viable. Do they have a good chance at winning the west? Most likely not; unless something happens to either Golden State...