- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Messages
- 34,763
- Reaction score
- 561
uuugh...
Its only the first quarter. And its the Cowboys. Don't sweat.uuugh...
Would give the real refs leverage. It would be a way of showing the world the replacement refs suck balls so the real refs need to reach an agreement faster, thus putting the pressure on the NFL to reach an agreement with the refs.Why doesn't the NFL compensate for the replacement refs by allowing them to change penalty calls?
and no-calls, like that hold in the endzoneWhy doesn't the NFL compensate for the replacement refs by allowing them to change penalty calls?
That doesnt make sense thoWould give the real refs leverage. It would be a way of showing the world the replacement refs suck balls so the real refs need to reach an agreement faster, thus putting the pressure on the NFL to reach an agreement with the refs.
never. i always sweat.Its only the first quarter. And its the Cowboys. Don't sweat.
I hate how much screen time his brother getsi hate how much screen time he gets.
That's what I'm saying. Giving them the ability to change calls cause they are replacement refs showcases how bad the NFL needs the real refs. Thus giving the real refs leverage. And the NFL doesn't want them to have leverage.That doesnt make sense tho
Why would the NFL use the replacement refs as an example? From the things the refs association is saying, the NFL isn't in much of a rush to get the real refs back, and I dont think the NFL really likes the fact that the replacements suck (not allowing coaches to talk about them in interviews, etc.)
Why showcase to the world how much the NFL needs the refs association?