BwareDWare94
Where were you when the world stopped turning?
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2011
- Messages
- 8,989
- Reaction score
- 140
Romo works on football as much as Vick and any other QB in the game. Don't be ridiculous.Stats don't mean anything, you especially should know this. Troy Aikman, NEVER threw for more than 20 TD's in a season, and in a quarter of the seasons he played, he threw more INT's than TD's. In your eyes, Romo is better than Aikman because Romo's career QB Rating is 96.9, and Aikman's 81.6.
But no, that's not the case.
And yes, I would take Vick over Romo. Vick actually works on football in the off-season, rather than going on vacations all the time with his celebrity girlfriends.
And yes, Tony Romo is better than Troy Aikman ever was. I don't care if Troy Aikman won three Super Bowls. He had one of the greatest running backs of all time (A running back, something Romo has never had), arguably one of if not the best offensive lines of all time, a plethora of weapons including Michael Irvin, not to mention a consistently good defense.
Romo has had none of these things outside of good receivers. He's had quite a few good receivers and Jason Witten, but otherwise a shitty offensive line and a horrible running game. When he had TO, he had an aged Terry Glenn and then Patrick Crayton--not exactly #2 receiver material. Miles Austin can't stay healthy. Dez Bryant has had health issues as well. Romo's first good running back broke his fucking leg 3-4 games into a starting role.
Tony Romo is the most hated, and because of that, most underrated quarterback in football. Without that star on his helmet, everybody acknowledges how good he is.
I would take Tony Romo over Troy Aikman any day.