- Joined
- Feb 15, 2009
- Messages
- 27,130
- Reaction score
- 1,228
Waiving Boozer makes no sense in the short term, either.
I agree, but Im not sure the Bulls want someone that slow. I wouldnt do it if i was chicago, but i think they wellWaiving Boozer makes no sense in the short term, either.
No chance. 0% chance. Not happening.You guys seriously don't think the Bulls are going to cut Boozer do you?
Bulls won't even chance it.No chance. 0% chance. Not happening.
Only way it happens is if Boozer re-signs at a lower rate. He'll be a Bull next year.
You can't with Boozer, cause he's gonna go where ever the dollar signs are.Bulls won't even chance it.
I doubt it.is the amnesty waive going to be available every year? i havent read any of the details of the new cba lol
For example, Detroit could waive Gordon this off-season, and then Villanueva next. Which would be ideal, cause then them 2 plus Rip and Maxiell will be off the book all at the same time lol.•Each team permitted to waive 1 player prior to any season of the CBA(only for contracts in place at the inception of the CBA) and have 100% of the player's salary removed from team salary for Cap and Tax purposes.
IMO, we waive Gordon and the Bulls pick up a bit of his contract for us•A modified waiver process will be utilized for players waived pursuant to the Amnesty rule, under which teams with Room under the Cap can submit competing offers to assume some but not all of the player's remaining contract. If a player's contract is claimed in this manner, the remaining portion of the player's salary will continue to be paid by the team that waived him.
bg would be the better fit. hes younger and you know they can count on him full-season.no i heard TMac to the Bulls is a done deal