- Joined
- Jul 6, 2006
- Messages
- 59,823
- Reaction score
- 582
i knowLol at the thought of Steve Blake and Derek Fisher battling for a STARTING job in the NBA.
i knowLol at the thought of Steve Blake and Derek Fisher battling for a STARTING job in the NBA.
This just leaves me dumbfounded how the owners were giving the players until tomorrow to vote on the deal and they still have no meeting scheduled. Where is the sense of urgency???The NBA is in serious discussions with the NBPA about scheduling a meeting on Tuesday, a day before the deadline set by the league for their latest offer to be accepted.
After Wednesday, the league states that it will reduce its offer to the players to 47% of BRI, with salary rollbacks and numerous new restraints on player contracts and team spending.
No meeting has yet been finalized by the two sides.
Meanwhile, Steve Blake is actively working the phones to encourage union members to push their team representatives to ask the NBPA's executive committee for a full player vote on the league's take-it-or-leave-it proposal. Even though Blake is not advocating a yes vote, there is a swell of support from players who at least want the chance to vote.
Adrian Wojnarowski tweets that in conversations with players and agents on Monday, "there's still much stronger support for rejecting league offer."
Sam Amick reports that Kevin Martin says the players should accept the league's offer.
I see what you mean. During the NFL lockout the reps seemed much more representative, for lack of a better term. I guess that's what happens when you have Olineman instead of a bunch of huge egosI'm hearing some owners may not even accept this deal )aka MJ, the Bucks, the Blazers...etc)
If by some lucky reason the players accept this deal only to have MJ and his gang reject it, i'ma be soooo pissed.
But I don't think that will happen.
Anyone else find it weird that there are only 30 player reps??? I mean yes 1 per team, but I mean even on teams guys want something different...
Bye bye season, players rejected owners offer.No deal.
"The current offer on the table from the NBA is one that we cannot accept," Fisher said Tuesday after a meeting of 29 of the 30 team player reps to discuss how to end the lockout.
Not necessarily. The players are willing to give the owners a better BRI split if they loosen up some of the system issues, and I think the owners would be willing, as long as they're getting what they want on BRI. The owners are just looking to have a more profitable league, for themselves. Stern said all along, system issues won't stop a deal, and I think that will be the case.
Would a "boom goes the dynamite" exclamation be appropriate here?SportsCenter SportsCenter
#NBA - NBPA says David Stern's latest proposal (roughly 50-50 split of BRI) is not acceptable
How much do they lose from not playing this season again?The players received 57 percent of BRI under the old system, but are not ready to accept a deal where they take just 50 percent.
Over the proposed 10-year deal, that becomes an estimated $3 billion concession.