- Joined
- Sep 25, 2009
- Messages
- 25,700
- Reaction score
- 771
+1 lolNeither does anybody else
+1 lolNeither does anybody else
That's head. -_____-Yeah, Because Ray hits 8 threes every game
And we don't suck like the Knicks do
This is such a stupid conversation.Actually it's like when somebody says "you're blowing mines" when you say some shit they don't approve of. Which is another way to say "that's head" If you were praising them, I'd say "You sucking mad dick right now". there's a difference
This series wouldn't have been closer if the Knicks had Willis Reed. The difference in Game 1 and 2 wasn't any certain players, it was just that the Knicks couldn't execute at the end of games and the Celtics could.Damn the Knicks lost last night, wouldve been a much closer series if Billups and Amare played but oh well. We need to atleast win 1 game in this series or else thats just embarassing.
Thats so not true, if Billups was in late in Game 1 or if Amare was in there late in Game 2. We wouldve won 1 of those games. You obviously dont execute a last second shot with Jared Jeffries handling the ball or Jeffries playing defense on the Celtics last possession.This series wouldn't have been closer if the Knicks had Willis Reed. The difference in Game 1 and 2 wasn't any certain players, it was just that the Knicks couldn't execute at the end of games and the Celtics could.
Jeffries is a better defender than Amare is so I don't know what you're getting at? Like I said, it didn't matter who the Knicks had at the end of the games. The Celtics executed better than the Knicks at the end of Game 1 and 2, and won because of it.Thats so not true, if Billups was in late in Game 1 or if Amare was in there late in Game 2. We wouldve won 1 of those games. You obviously dont execute a last second shot with Jared Jeffries handling the ball or Jeffries playing defense on the Celtics last possession.
probablyChicago with the sweep today?
But had Amare and Billups been on the court, Melo probably wouldn't have still carried the offense like he had. It would've been a different game. The bottom line being, the Celtics, no matter what players the Knicks have on the court, are the better team, especially in the 4th quarter.If Amare and Billups were on the court at the end of the game they wouldve executed a lot more than the players who were on the court at the end of that game. Its not that Jeffries is a better defender, at that moment at time Amare and Billups have that clutch factor more than the other guys on the team.
I honestly agree, but I was just trying to educate the manThis is such a stupid conversation.
or notChicago with the sweep today?