- Thread starter
- #1
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2006
- Messages
- 32,619
- Reaction score
- 174
THE NUMBERS:
Jay Cutler
65/101 (64.4%) 760 YDS 6 TD 5 INT* 86.2 RAT
*4 INT came in Week #1
Devin Hester
13 REC 187 YDS 2 TD
Earl Bennett
13 REC 168 YDS
Johnny Knox
9 REC 159 YDS 2 TD
Brandon Marshall (Denver)
12 REC 128 YDS 1 TD
Eddie Royal (Denver)
6 REC 42 YDS 0 TD
Looks to me like Cutler is doing just fine with the receivers he's got and while Marshall is throwing fits and Eddie Royal has completely fallen off the map. Cutler is the one that made Royal into the weapon he was, not the other way around like you seemed to think. Cutler was good before Royal and Cutler is good now that he doesn't have Royal and is playing with terrible receivers.
You can say whatever you want about Cutler and the WR's, but right now you are looking like an idiot (I know it's early, but still). Cutler has always been a good QB, there's a reason he was a high draft pick. I could go on with some more stupid posts about how Cutler would suck, because he doesn't have the great Marshall and Royal, but I have to get back to my homework. Again, I know it's early, but you're looking really silly right about now.
Jay Cutler
65/101 (64.4%) 760 YDS 6 TD 5 INT* 86.2 RAT
*4 INT came in Week #1
Devin Hester
13 REC 187 YDS 2 TD
Earl Bennett
13 REC 168 YDS
Johnny Knox
9 REC 159 YDS 2 TD
Brandon Marshall (Denver)
12 REC 128 YDS 1 TD
Eddie Royal (Denver)
6 REC 42 YDS 0 TD
Looks to me like Cutler is doing just fine with the receivers he's got and while Marshall is throwing fits and Eddie Royal has completely fallen off the map. Cutler is the one that made Royal into the weapon he was, not the other way around like you seemed to think. Cutler was good before Royal and Cutler is good now that he doesn't have Royal and is playing with terrible receivers.
The Bears were "mediocre" last season despite finishing 1 GB back of the great Vikings and they added Cutler, while the Vikings added Favre. I'd say that's a wash right now in terms of better addition. Both have done good things. So I don't see how the Bears can be "mediocre" and the Vikings can be the next best thing.You guys are out of your f'ing minds.
The Bears, a mediocre team last season are suddenly the NFC North favorite? Is Cutler like this great quarterback?
Let's see how Cutler does without Brandon Marshall and Eddie Royal. No way in hell do the Bears win more game than the Vikings.
And how about justifying some of these predictions. I mean anybody can just rank teams from 1-32. I want to hear exactly why some of these pathetic predictions are being made.
You can say whatever you want about Cutler and the WR's, but right now you are looking like an idiot (I know it's early, but still). Cutler has always been a good QB, there's a reason he was a high draft pick. I could go on with some more stupid posts about how Cutler would suck, because he doesn't have the great Marshall and Royal, but I have to get back to my homework. Again, I know it's early, but you're looking really silly right about now.