For the Guy Who Said Cutler Couldn't Do It Without Marshall & Royal

Status
Not open for further replies.

bestkeptsecret13

Chicago's Finest
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
32,619
Reaction score
174
THE NUMBERS:

Jay Cutler
65/101 (64.4%) 760 YDS 6 TD 5 INT* 86.2 RAT
*4 INT came in Week #1

Devin Hester
13 REC 187 YDS 2 TD

Earl Bennett
13 REC 168 YDS

Johnny Knox
9 REC 159 YDS 2 TD

Brandon Marshall (Denver)
12 REC 128 YDS 1 TD

Eddie Royal (Denver)
6 REC 42 YDS 0 TD

Looks to me like Cutler is doing just fine with the receivers he's got and while Marshall is throwing fits and Eddie Royal has completely fallen off the map. Cutler is the one that made Royal into the weapon he was, not the other way around like you seemed to think. Cutler was good before Royal and Cutler is good now that he doesn't have Royal and is playing with terrible receivers.

You guys are out of your f'ing minds.
The Bears, a mediocre team last season are suddenly the NFC North favorite? Is Cutler like this great quarterback?
Let's see how Cutler does without Brandon Marshall and Eddie Royal. No way in hell do the Bears win more game than the Vikings.
And how about justifying some of these predictions. I mean anybody can just rank teams from 1-32. I want to hear exactly why some of these pathetic predictions are being made.
The Bears were "mediocre" last season despite finishing 1 GB back of the great Vikings and they added Cutler, while the Vikings added Favre. I'd say that's a wash right now in terms of better addition. Both have done good things. So I don't see how the Bears can be "mediocre" and the Vikings can be the next best thing.

You can say whatever you want about Cutler and the WR's, but right now you are looking like an idiot (I know it's early, but still). Cutler has always been a good QB, there's a reason he was a high draft pick. I could go on with some more stupid posts about how Cutler would suck, because he doesn't have the great Marshall and Royal, but I have to get back to my homework. Again, I know it's early, but you're looking really silly right about now.
 

The Young One

The Champion
Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 11, 2006
Messages
50,587
Reaction score
569
This is gonna be good. I will say cutler has did better than i thought he would.
 

yezzir

Call me Slim Roethlisberger.
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
5,967
Reaction score
2
Idc what people think, Cutler is the real deal. He made Brandon Marshall and Eddie Royal who they were like you said. Brandon Marshall is legit too though, he just needs to get into the offense. I really think week 1 was just a fluke/bad week.
 

.GR

#BlackFalcon
Hall of Fame
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
36,085
Reaction score
14
Yeah, he is the real deal. He sure is silencing the critics. *Waits for AE to say it's only week 4.*
 

RipCity32

King Of The East
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
88,197
Reaction score
730
I don't remember anyone saying he wasn't the real deal lol.
 

ZigZag

TEH GREAT ZIGGY
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
18,060
Reaction score
78
Cutler is going to be a really good quarterback as he continues to grow. He had that bad week 1 but it was his first game with a brand new team after a stressful off season. He's a very good deep ball thrower and actually can be a clutch QB. He also usually doesn't give up on plays and is mobile for a chubby boy.
 

bestkeptsecret13

Chicago's Finest
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
32,619
Reaction score
174
I don't remember anyone saying he wasn't the real deal lol.
AE ranted about how he was only good because he had Royal and Marshall and said all sorts of dumb <Censored> in the predictions thread.
 

yezzir

Call me Slim Roethlisberger.
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
5,967
Reaction score
2
Oh, so this was solely for AE? lol
 

footballplaya52

Solo Dolo
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
12,623
Reaction score
614
im not gonna deny cutlers ability but this is also somewhat biased

what he said is "dumb<Censored>" because your a bears fan
 

bestkeptsecret13

Chicago's Finest
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
32,619
Reaction score
174
im not gonna deny cutlers ability but this is also somewhat biased

what he said is "dumb<Censored>" because your a bears fan
So the Bears really are "terrible"? Because I'm pretty sure if they are terrible and are 2-1 and were 9-7 last year, while the Vikings were 10-6 last year and are 3-0 this year, then they can't be anything amazing, because we only finished 1 GB last year and are only 1 GB right now. How can the Vikings better this year because they added a QB and recovered from injuries, but the Bears got a QB and healthy on defense and they are still "terrible"? Something's not adding up...
 

RipCity32

King Of The East
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
88,197
Reaction score
730
Bears will lose to Detroit this weekend ^_^
 

A.E

Vottomatic
Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
14,335
Reaction score
132
Talking a lot of <Censored> for a team that's looking up at purple in the standings.

Now you go ahead and say it so I don't have to...

"Only 3 weeks down in a 17 week regular season."

I think its funny Bears' fans are all giddy over the fact that they beat the Seahawks last week...and not by much. Or are your heads so big b/c you beat a Pittsburgh team that has a ton of problems? Let me know when you guys win an impressive game.
 

A.E

Vottomatic
Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
14,335
Reaction score
132
Yeah, he is the real deal. He sure is silencing the critics. *Waits for AE to say it's only week 4.*
I also don't want to hear any junk coming from the Steel...err...I mean Raiders fan.
 

bestkeptsecret13

Chicago's Finest
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
32,619
Reaction score
174
Talking a lot of <Censored> for a team that's looking up at purple in the standings.

Now you go ahead and say it so I don't have to...

"Only 3 weeks down in a 17 week regular season."

I think its funny Bears' fans are all giddy over the fact that they beat the Seahawks last week...and not by much. Or are your heads so big b/c you beat a Pittsburgh team that has a ton of problems? Let me know when you guys win an impressive game.
Ummm....... You beat the BROWNS, LIONS and 49ERS. GET THE <Censored> OUTTA HERE!

We barely beat the Seahawks... You barely beat the 49ers... We beat the Super Bowl Champs... You beat the Lions... We lost to the Packers... You beat the Browns...

Who has had the tougher schedule? Be honest...
 

A.E

Vottomatic
Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
14,335
Reaction score
132
Ummm....... You beat the BROWNS, LIONS and 49ERS. GET THE <Censored> OUTTA HERE!
I am not the one making an entire thread out of my teams first 3 games.

If you think that I look or feel stupid right now...think again. What did I say in the quote of mine...?

"Let's see how Cutler does w/o Marshall and Royal?" - ...and I am still watching...

"No way in hell the Bears finish ahead of the Vikings in the Standings" - ...so far I am on the money.

As a Yankee fan, I am used to <Censored> like this. Blue Jay fans make up these types of threads every single April and then shut their damn mouths by June.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 17)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top