- Thread starter
- #21
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Messages
- 127,713
- Reaction score
- 2,100
you sound like a completely different person now. yea you said he was gone. you never said anything about saving money lol. you've always talked about the endless pockets
You can't seriously say that 32 mill per for 6 years is bad, but 31 mill per for 5 years is somehow good.Mexi said:they could outbid them if they want
Its not a good baseball deal. They can have him
Just cause the dodgers have a ton of money doesnt mean they need to use it every single time
They dont want too many long term commitments
they just spend like 160 on cuban playersPapa Pugzo said:you sound like a completely different person now. yea you said he was gone. you never said anything about saving money lol. you've always talked about the endless pockets
the less years from a pitching contract, the betterelcheato said:You can't seriously say that 32 mill per for 6 years is bad, but 31 mill per for 5 years is somehow good.
as of now, i dont like cuetoelcheato said:And if the Dodgers panic and give Cueto 6 years, you gonna try to justify it?
yea maybe hockey fans who had unrealistic expectations about the blue jays payroll. don't understand the outrage.Rios said:Mexi sounds salty lol.
But that's how blue Jays fans feel about how price went to Boston
snipezo said:yea maybe hockey fans who had unrealistic expectations about the blue jays payroll. don't understand the outrage.