- Thread starter
- #21
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2011
- Messages
- 18,967
- Reaction score
- 460
Romo probably was the best QB in the division last year. And by a pretty wide margain too.
vnardella5 said:im sorry but i would take Eli, Foles, or RGIII over Romo any day
vnardella5 said:going off of last years total QBR, Foles was about ten pooints higher...i think we can all agree eli and rgiii had a down year...if we look then at 2012 QBR, Eli and RGIII were also ahead of romo..plus my goal would be to win the superbowl and if i cant even make the play offs with romo's defense............................
i agree with this foles..back to QBR, Foles was #5 in the NFL last year...i will say that romo is by far the most consistent year to year..but i dont get how u guys dont see that foles was betterPepe Silvia said:lol, Nick Foles had something like a 27:1 TD/INT ratio. You can say all you want about the system, but Foles was pretty easily the best QB in the division.
Pepe Silvia said:lol, Nick Foles had something like a 27:1 TD/INT ratio. You can say all you want about the system, but Foles was pretty easily the best QB in the division.
Pepe Silvia said:lol, Nick Foles had something like a 27:1 TD/INT ratio. You can say all you want about the system, but Foles was pretty easily the best QB in the division.
this is where we see 2 different people..they eye test people and the stats people...stats show that Foles was way better then Romo, and every other QB except 4 ahead of him...the eye test would favor Romo, but stats are in Foles favorBwareDWare94 said:
You serious? Tony was better than Foles. If you watched both, you saw who was better. Foles had one ridiculous game. Otherwise, he was decent.
vnardella5 said:this is where we see 2 different people..they eye test people and the stats people...stats show that Foles was way better then Romo, and every other QB except 4 ahead of him...the eye test would favor Romo, but stats are in Foles favor
vnardella5 said:this is where we see 2 different people..they eye test people and the stats people...stats show that Foles was way better then Romo, and every other QB except 4 ahead of him...the eye test would favor Romo, but stats are in Foles favor
i do see where you are coming from but at the same time, take Dez away from Romo.........and yeaBwareDWare94 said:
Foles is favored by stats during one season. We're talking about who the better quarterback is, which I would say is pretty clear. Wait til we see Foles without a true #1 guy (unless Maclin stays healthy, that is).
You're kiddingFuhgeddaboudit said:I wouldn't consider Romo the best QB in the division overall...he doesn't even have a SB under his belt
Teagz said:You're kidding
BwareDWare94 said:
You serious? Tony was better than Foles. If you watched both, you saw who was better. Foles had one ridiculous game. Otherwise, he was decent.