- Thread starter
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2011
- Messages
- 18,967
- Reaction score
- 460
Buffalo, Miami, New England, or New York?
This isn't 2006 anymore dude and you're clearly a homer.bosoxlover12 said:9-7 lol
We were a Top 12 offense in 06 with Gabriel/Caldwell/Brown as our receivers, and won 12 games. Why in the world, when we have a better running attack, a better receiving core, and a better QB (2013 Brady>2006 Brady), would we win only 9 games? We've won 10+ every year except 2002, Brady's sophomore season.
10-6 at the bare minimum, 12-4 or 13-3 as the realistic option.
You're on crack if you think Amendola is going to step in and do what Welker did. Please give Welker some credit and stop thinking this is still an era where Belichick and Brady can turn average players into pro bowlers.bosoxlover12 said:Better than 06
We still have Gronk for our important games, sans the Falcons game. Amendola will produce the same as Welker has.
Everyone who has ever doubted the Patriots wrong have all bitten their tounges for it, except for the Giants. Dolphins do not scare me in the slightest
Please remind me how reaching the AFC Championship game two years in a row, going 1-1, is "not going far"RunRickyRun said:You won't get far in the playoffs, again, this season.
SportsLady said:Pats are SO overrated... I am going with my PHINS this time around, for sure...