- Thread starter
- #1
JZsportswhiz
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2013
- Messages
- 1,706
- Reaction score
- 61
Answer
He never really fit their offensive scheme or what Pete Carroll likes to do. I think that Collinsworth (for once) actually made a good point last night. He basically said that Graham is used to being able to run actual routes and have plays designed for him, whereas Russell Wilson is a huge improviser and he makes a lot of his plays on the fly... Which doesn't suit Graham.CP3MVP said:Still can't understand what the fuck Seattle is doing with Jimmy Graham
Or at all haha. He was targeted 8 times last night and for this season that's high lol.Foreman said:I was low on Graham as soon as that trade happened. I thought it was nice they finally had a great offensive weapon, but with how they play, he's not gonna be used to his full potential.
Ehhh I'm not sure that anyone was quite THAT high on them... Especially since both of the guys you mentioned are old and in the twilight of their career.RunSoHard said:Got to go Colts. The Packers have been struggling as of late, but they aren't struggling that bad. They almost put on a comeback against the Panthers a week ago.
The Colts brought in the likes of Andre Johnson and Frank Gore to give them that step forward and push for a superbowl run. Everyone thought this team was one of, if not the team to beat in the AFC.
You can't say that they weren't Superbowl contenders prior to the season. I listen to a ton of sports talk shows since I travel a ton for work and the majority of them had them sold as contenders.cavsfan817 said:Ehhh I'm not sure that anyone was quite THAT high on them... Especially since both of the guys you mentioned are old and in the twilight of their career.
Yeah they were contenders but obviously the Patriots were and still are the class of the AFC. I couldn't realistically put them over NE with their rosterRunSoHard said:You can't say that they weren't Superbowl contenders prior to the season. I listen to a ton of sports talk shows since I travel a ton for work and the majority of them had them sold as contenders.
what talent lmaoStray32 said:I say Colts because I can see reasons for the Packers/Broncos issues (injuries being a big one, Jordy Nelson/Peyton's issues respectively), Colts look like they have the talent to be much, much better
Can't be Superbowl Contenders without an Oline...just can't.RunSoHard said:You can't say that they weren't Superbowl contenders prior to the season. I listen to a ton of sports talk shows since I travel a ton for work and the majority of them had them sold as contenders.
Gore, Andre, TY Hilton, Donte Moncrief, Dwayne Allen, Coby Fleener and obviously Andrew Luck ... who hasn't been anywhere near as good as he was supposed to be this yearMattMac124 said:what talent lmao
If I have my choice going into the season I'm taking Cobb, Lacy, Jones, and AdamsStray32 said:Gore, Andre, TY Hilton, Donte Moncrief, Dwayne Allen, Coby Fleener and obviously Andrew Luck ... who hasn't been anywhere near as good as he was supposed to be this year
That's better than the non-Randall Cobb skill position players of Davante Adams, James Jones, James Starks and Richard Rodgers. Obviously like you said the Colts have major struggles on the O-line, but still, they should be a lot better than they are