- Thread starter
- #1
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2010
- Messages
- 36,768
- Reaction score
- 1,153
This was being debated on ESPN Boston, and I thought it was a very interesting topic to think about.
You have the 2007 Patriots offense. One of, if not, the best offenses of all time, and statistically won't be matched for a while.
You have Tom Brady, throwing 50 TD passes, an NFL record.
You got Randy Moss with 98 catches and almost 1500 yards, with the addition to the NFL record 23 TD receptions. He was the most feared WR in the NFL at the time
Wes Welker caught 112 catches that season for 1175 yards too.
They also set the records for most points in a season (589), highest point differential (+315), most 1st Downs (391), and most TDs (75).
They usually spread the ball out, with Welker, Moss, Stallworth, and then two of the following: Gaffney, Watson, Faulk, Maroney.
How is it that there could be a better offense?
Coming into the 2012 season, the Patriots looked really deadly. As a team with no deep threat from last years 5284 passing yard team, they signed Brandon Lloyd, a speedy WR with exceptionally good hands and field awareness. With Welker, Gronkowski, Hernandez, and now Lloyd, New England's only real concern, if it was even considered a concern, was the running game. With last year's starter Benjarvus Green-Ellis off to Cincinatti, most expected Brady to eclipse last year's passing numbers, since of the added talent of Lloyd.
But the running game has actually been extremely good, led by 2nd year player Stevan Ridley, as NE is 3rd in total rushing offense and 1st in rushing TDs. While its definitely obvious that a lot of that success is from defenses playing in sub packages to try to not let Brady have his, the run game is getting theirs. It creates a lot of mismatches for the defense: do they try to stop the successful run game by putting an extra LB out there, leaving less DBs for Brady, or do they play in the sub package defenses to stop the greatest QB of our generation, and pray that the running game isnt too successful? Its a lose-lose situation for most teams, and it will only get worse for defenses once Hernandez is healthy. Versatility is the epitome of this Patriots team. If we run in our base 2 WR- 2 TE- 1 RB system, with Lloyd, Welker, Gronkowski, Hernandez, and Ridley, we can throw the ball with ease in a spread formation, and we can run the ball hard by bunching both TEs as blockers. And when Edelman gets back, it makes it even harder, because as shown in last year's Playoffs, Aaron Hernandez can have success at a FB/RB position. So we have a 5 receiver spread with Lloyd and Hernandez wide, Welker and Edelman in slots, and Gronk in the middle, and then the next play we can have Hernandez on a pitch with Edelman (our best blocking WR) and Gronk taking the block role. And then we can always substitute Edelman for Wes in the 2-2-1 package from before, and the run game is even more deadly. There are an endless possibility of options that we can do on offense, which is why I'd say our offense in 2012 is deadlier than in 2007.
You have the 2007 Patriots offense. One of, if not, the best offenses of all time, and statistically won't be matched for a while.
You have Tom Brady, throwing 50 TD passes, an NFL record.
You got Randy Moss with 98 catches and almost 1500 yards, with the addition to the NFL record 23 TD receptions. He was the most feared WR in the NFL at the time
Wes Welker caught 112 catches that season for 1175 yards too.
They also set the records for most points in a season (589), highest point differential (+315), most 1st Downs (391), and most TDs (75).
They usually spread the ball out, with Welker, Moss, Stallworth, and then two of the following: Gaffney, Watson, Faulk, Maroney.
How is it that there could be a better offense?
Coming into the 2012 season, the Patriots looked really deadly. As a team with no deep threat from last years 5284 passing yard team, they signed Brandon Lloyd, a speedy WR with exceptionally good hands and field awareness. With Welker, Gronkowski, Hernandez, and now Lloyd, New England's only real concern, if it was even considered a concern, was the running game. With last year's starter Benjarvus Green-Ellis off to Cincinatti, most expected Brady to eclipse last year's passing numbers, since of the added talent of Lloyd.
But the running game has actually been extremely good, led by 2nd year player Stevan Ridley, as NE is 3rd in total rushing offense and 1st in rushing TDs. While its definitely obvious that a lot of that success is from defenses playing in sub packages to try to not let Brady have his, the run game is getting theirs. It creates a lot of mismatches for the defense: do they try to stop the successful run game by putting an extra LB out there, leaving less DBs for Brady, or do they play in the sub package defenses to stop the greatest QB of our generation, and pray that the running game isnt too successful? Its a lose-lose situation for most teams, and it will only get worse for defenses once Hernandez is healthy. Versatility is the epitome of this Patriots team. If we run in our base 2 WR- 2 TE- 1 RB system, with Lloyd, Welker, Gronkowski, Hernandez, and Ridley, we can throw the ball with ease in a spread formation, and we can run the ball hard by bunching both TEs as blockers. And when Edelman gets back, it makes it even harder, because as shown in last year's Playoffs, Aaron Hernandez can have success at a FB/RB position. So we have a 5 receiver spread with Lloyd and Hernandez wide, Welker and Edelman in slots, and Gronk in the middle, and then the next play we can have Hernandez on a pitch with Edelman (our best blocking WR) and Gronk taking the block role. And then we can always substitute Edelman for Wes in the 2-2-1 package from before, and the run game is even more deadly. There are an endless possibility of options that we can do on offense, which is why I'd say our offense in 2012 is deadlier than in 2007.