Which is more screwed?

Who is more screwed in this Situation?

  • New England without Tom Brady

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Indianapolis without Peyton Manning

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.

A.E

Vottomatic
Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
14,335
Reaction score
132
A question stolen from ESPN...but yet asked with a different twist. I just want to know what SI thinks about both injured stars & which of their teams would be hurting more without them.


 

.GR

#BlackFalcon
Hall of Fame
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
36,085
Reaction score
14
NE without Brady.
 

RipCity32

King Of The East
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
88,197
Reaction score
730
I seen that question a few days ago on ESPN as well. It made me think.

It would be the Patriots. Seeing as they have no backups whose names I can remember.
The Colts got Sorgi and Gray as backups. Who are both descent and better than what the Pats have.

Plus I think the whole Randy Moss re-born thing was all Brady, he would go back to the average Moss as soon as Brady goes down.
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
Both have crappy back ups for QB... We've seen Matt Cassell play in pre-season, and he's awful and his first pass against the Dolphins was an INT. I watched the entire Colts vs Titans game last season when the Browns playoff hope was on the line and Jim Sorgi was starting so Peyton would stay healthy, horrible game by him. Both are equally as screwed IMO.
 

Grandy28

Victory!!!!
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
9,606
Reaction score
0
Jim Sorgi is a bum. Matt Cassell wasn't bad in college.

I'd say the Colts.
 

yezzir

Call me Slim Roethlisberger.
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
5,967
Reaction score
2
OK first of all, the whole Brady thing is bull<Censored>. He's gonna be fine.

But if it were to happen, I'd say NE without Brady. Indy just seems like their offensive system makes it a little easier for a different quarterback to step in and try to manage it. But both would be bad for either team.
 

A.E

Vottomatic
Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
14,335
Reaction score
132
Allow me to Campaign for a minute...

The way I look at is this, if either Brady or Manning went down, suddenly both teams are utilizing the ground attack more. With that being said, I view Joe Addai as being a much better everydown back than Laurance Maroney. Yes, the Patriots have Randy Moss, I know, but trust me when I say that Matt Cassell and Jim Sorgi won't be throwing way downfield until they are comfortable. With that being the case, the passing game underneath the secondary would be huge. Again, Indianapolis' personnel for that situation is better than the Patriots.

Those of you that saw any of Matt Cassell take the field during a Patriots' blow-out in 2007...saw a guy that really isn't a starting NFL quarterback. Jim Sorgi may not be that much better of an NFL starting quarterback but I do see Sorgi as having the better physical ability and I see Peyton Manning as being the better teacher.

That's right...while Brady is running around with his European super models, Manning and Sorgi are in the film room dissecting the Pats' defense. ;)
 

RipCity32

King Of The East
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
88,197
Reaction score
730
Colts have Quinn Gray, who ain't that bad. He has shown he is alright.
 

JoshHoward5

LONG LIVE THE CHARIOT
Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
18,705
Reaction score
14
Jim Sorgi is a bum. Matt Cassell wasn't bad in college.

I'd say the Colts.
Cassell never played. He backed up Leinart and Palmer.

But I believe that the Pats system goes through Brady more then the Colts go through Manning. Basically I think it breaks down to who has the better rushing attack, and I believe Addai and the Colts do a better job at that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top