Sports Illustrated: Cavs owner Gilbert willing to spend whatever it takes to win

Status
Not open for further replies.

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
When last we left Dan Gilbert, he appeared to have lost his mind, along with the minds of anybody within three miles of him. LeBron James had left Gilbert's Cleveland Cavaliers for the Miami Heat -- I don't remember the details, but I vaguely recall the announcement being televised in some way -- and Gilbert was livid. He wrote one of the great letters in the history of sports, an angry screed that included this passage:

I want to make one statement to you tonight: "I personally guarantee that the Cleveland Cavaliers will win an NBA Championship before the self-titled former 'king' wins one."

You can take it to the bank.

It was an amazing letter. But what Gilbert has done since then is even more amazing. It is one of the most aggressive strategies ever attempted by a sports owner. We'll get to it in a minute.

Things do not seem to be going well for Gilbert right now. The self-titled King is in the Eastern Conference finals while Gilbert is running one of the worst teams in sports. After LeBron left, the Cavs became something you don't see much in sports these days: lovable losers. They sold out games. They played hard. They shocked some of the best teams in the league, including the Heat. But mostly they lost, and losing is only lovable for a little while. I suspect Gilbert did not love it for even a day.

Now, back to that letter. Everybody thought Gilbert was insane. He is not. Gilbert might be wrong; I believe he will be wrong. I believe LeBron James will win a title with the Heat, though I'm skeptical it will be this year. (Also, it is possible, with Dwyane Wade turning 30 next January, that Wade's body will break down and this Heat group will never win a championship. But that is a separate discussion, and not a pleasant one. I hope Wade has a long career.)

Anyway, Gilbert may be wrong, but he is not crazy. He is determined. There is a difference. That last line -- "You can take it to the bank" -- is the one we need to take literally.

Dan Gilbert has put his money where his mouth is, in a way that is almost unprecedented in the NBA. At the trade deadline, the Cavs traded in-his-prime point guard Mo Williams for prime-rib-loving point guard Baron Davis, who hasn't tried in two years.

The Cavs must pay Davis roughly $29 million over the next two seasons. Williams gets $17 million. (Jamario Moon, who was included in the deal, has a team option of $3.2 million that the Clippers can decline if they choose.) The Cavs also got the Clippers' 2011 first-round pick in the trade.

This means Dan Gilbert spent $12 million for one first-round pick.

He was not done. The Cavs tried to acquire Rip Hamilton from the Pistons for a 2012 first-round pick. Hamilton had fallen so far out of favor with the Pistons that his line in the box score read "DNP-%&!#$!" Hamilton is owed a maximum of $25 million over the next two years. Gilbert didn't care. Hamilton had zero interest in playing for the Cavs. Gilbert didn't care about that either.

Gilbert was willing to either let Hamilton play for the full $25 million (if Rip changed his mind about Cleveland) or buy him out, presumably for at least $15 million. Hamilton wouldn't take a buyout, out of pride (which was dumb, since he would be playing for the Bulls right now, and would have made most of his money), so the trade got nixed.

Add this up: $12 million in the Davis trade, plus at least $15 million (I suspect quite a bit more) for the Pistons' pick. Gilbert was ready to fork over around $30 million for two first-round picks -- neither of which is likely to be in the top three in the draft. The Clippers' pick only has a 2.8 percent chance of moving up to No. 1 this year, and the Pistons' pick next year would have been protected; if it was at the top of the draft, the Pistons would have kept it.

AROUND THIRTY MILLION DOLLARS. This is astounding. In 2009, the Lakers sold the No. 29 overall pick for $3 million. Kobe Bryant, the highest-paid player in the league this year, made $24.8 million. LeBron James and Dwyane Wade combined make $28.5 million. The Sacramento Kings' entire team only made $44 million.

Yet Gilbert was willing to spend some-$30 million for two first-round picks. And that is before he actually paid the guys that the Cavs picked.


I think it is safe to say that when the NBA locks out its players this summer, Gilbert will not be the one crying poverty.

Even if Dirk Nowitzki scores 65 points in a playoff game or Taj Gibson jumps 20 feet in the air, this may be the most incredible number of the NBA season: nearly $30 million for two first-round picks.

This tells you everything you need to know about Dan Gilbert. That letter last summer may have made him a punch line nationally. But he meant every word of it. We saw it as a rant, but I think he saw it as a plan.

The Gilbert who wrote that screed last summer is the same Gilbert who built Quicken Loans into a lending giant and the same one who is running the Cavaliers today. The man is manic about winning.

All owners say they want to win. Nobody ever buys a team and says "Hello, everybody! I am totally going to shed salary as soon as people renew their season-tickets. Also, I'm putting my two sons and all three of my mistresses on the team payroll. Now, what city do we play in?" No, they say they want to win. But once they take control, a lot of owners go back to being businessmen and worry mostly about making a profit. They're entitled to do that, but it's not much fun for fans.

Well, Dan Gilbert really, really wants to win. He has made plenty of mistakes in Cleveland, but he made almost all of them because he was trying to win.

I don't know if Gilbert will turn the Cavs into a contender. A lot goes into that, and the Cavs have an unproven management team. But it is not wise to bet against a man who is this hungry. Last summer, Gilbert sounded like he was whining because somebody took his ball away. He wants his ball back now. Don't be surprised if he gets it.
 

DJT

Members
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
27,416
Reaction score
302
Not sure if any 2 guys in this draft is worth 30M...
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
Probably not but it's about making the rebuild faster.
 

DJT

Members
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
27,416
Reaction score
302
If I were them I'd try to lure in FAs with that money, rather than draft picks.
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
Lets be realistic, no big star is coming to play in Cleveland through free agency.. We'd have to over pay just to get an all-star like Andre Iguodula or something like that.. Would rather stock draft picks.
 

DJT

Members
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
27,416
Reaction score
302
Eh I think they could easily snag some people. Don't necessarily have to be an all-star to be better than this draft.
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
i'll probably be put on blast, but so be it. im honestly curious

why didnt he spend more when they had LeBron?
(maybe he did and im being naive. i guess they had ben wallace, larry hughes, jamison, mo will, but was that the best they could do?)
 

Pugz

#ForPaul
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
127,713
Reaction score
2,100
they can pay that much for rip this off-season if theyd like :p


get our pick next season too, just keep it top 3 portected.
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
i'll probably be put on blast, but so be it. im honestly curious

why didnt he spend more when they had LeBron?
(maybe he did and im being naive. i guess they had ben wallace, larry hughes, jamison, mo will, but was that the best they could do?)
He gave Larry Hughes that large ass contract, and everyone knew he wasn't worth that much. We never had that much cap space to make these kind of deals as well for high picks. We took on Shaq for 20 million in one year to be a role player and were top of the league in salary, or at least top 3.
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
i kinda feel bad for cleveland
they would have beat the lakers both years
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
i have like 25% doubt
 

VC15

New Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2006
Messages
15,924
Reaction score
215
Didn't Phoenix offer Amare in exchange for Hickson?
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
No, we offered it and they didn't have an answer at the deadline the Cavs set. The Cavs tried to get Amare for 2 years, we didn't decline anything.
 

manny3118

New Member
Joined
May 16, 2011
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
To this day, I do not understand the logic behind the Baron Davis trade. Even if the Cavs would have gotten 5 picks in this years draft, I would have been hard pressed to pull the trigger.
 

Elite

PND SZN
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
18,915
Reaction score
1,162
To this day, I do not understand the logic behind the Baron Davis trade. Even if the Cavs would have gotten 5 picks in this years draft, I would have been hard pressed to pull the trigger.
Because they got the #1 overall pick for Mo Williams, who LA is still gonna be stuck with anyway because of player options
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
And even if it didn't end up at #1, it is still a no brainer deal for the Cavs. Even in a bad draft, having 2 lottery picks is nice for a rebuilding team, and the cap situation is irrelevant for us, because we aren't going to lure any big stars through free agency. Plus, even though I like the guy, Mo Williams had to go..
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
win win trade dammit

clippers had to get rid of baron
it was a small chance that the pick would be #1, it sucks that it was, but they value next years draft more anyways.
speaking of next year, the clippers 2012 1st rounder is the Wolves unprotected pick so like i said before, potential for a top 3 pick, right?

mo played great as a clip and bledsoe had a really good rookie year. wouldnt he be a top 10 pick in this draft? they dont NEED that PG.
or Derrick Williams. he would have been nice to pair with Blake, but if Aminu lives up to what he can be, Clippers are fine with it

trading Baron also freed up money to go after a FA or trade(Jeff Green?, trade for Iggy?) and re-sign DeAndre which is a must.

having Blake makes this not THAT big of a deal. if they didnt have blake, oh yeah, you criticize the hell out of it
 

Pugz

#ForPaul
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
127,713
Reaction score
2,100
no, clippers would be 10x better off now and in the future if they kept that pick...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top