- Joined
- Jun 11, 2008
- Messages
- 67,842
- Reaction score
- 2,208
Acting like Byron Scott was in on it, and was purposely not playing good players is giving him too much credit. He is the worst coach.
It's more that I think the only reason he was hired was because the front office knew this was a rebuild and he was given the job basically because Kobe wanted him, with absolutely no intention of being competitive.elcheato said:Acting like Byron Scott was in on it, and was purposely not playing good players is giving him too much credit. He is the worst coach.
I understand the premise behind it, but I disagree that playing Russell and Randle a little more wouldve made them significantly more competitve to make a difference.CameronCrazy06 said:You need to understand the front office aspect of this. The lakers needed to lose a lot in order to get in a position to keep their pick.
and that's giving the front office too much creditCameronCrazy06 said:It's more that I think the only reason he was hired was because the front office knew this was a rebuild and he was given the job basically because Kobe wanted him, with absolutely no intention of being competitive.
Why else would they give him a two year contract and not retain him when all signs pointed to them sucking?elcheato said:and that's giving the front office too much credit
and i stand by what i saidbosoxlover12 said:no.
their pick is top 3 protected. I hope it falls to 4 so they don't get it.
fuck the lakers