- Thread starter
- #21
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
- Messages
- 31,527
- Reaction score
- 876
What?
Because they knew their title contending years were over, so why not start over? But that doesn't mean they're just going to start playing for losses. Anyone that has watched this team, or the majority of NBA teams, know most teams will play their hardest and go for wins.Then why did they get rid of KG and PP?
That won't happen. The Celtics management and Rondo himself are already saying he's close.That's because nobody in their right mind goes out on the court to lose a game. These are all competitors that want to prove their worth. But I highly doubt any Celtics exec's are ecstatic about the wins they have gotten thus far.
Even if they can't successfully "tank", one thing Boston can do is tell their best player to take his sweet time to come back. Especially after seeing what Rose has done.
thats 100% false. B/R is a lot more reliable than whatever bs data source you usenolafan33 said:The Celtics as a team are 16th in offensive rebounding, 30th in defensive rebounding, 25th in total rebounding.
THANK YOUelcheato said:Why are we even discussing the Celtics in this? They're not a good team, Asik makes no sense for them.
If you are referring to basketball reference then it's 18th and 30th.bosoxlover12 said:thats 100% false. B/R is a lot more reliable than whatever bs data source you use