Maple: 8 - a better rebuttal on team performance with players in lineup would have won this easily
BKS: 7 - lack of strong rebuttal (almost conceding points about Calderon) and closing statement, though good points were made for Arenas
Maple - 7, I was reading through he made some good points about Calderon, but he also said some wrong clear wrong points, at least in my opinion. He used salary as an example, which has nothing to do with who is better. Also he said Arenas is not a great shooter, which is clearly wrong.
BKS - 6, he really didn't try to debate against Calderon, should have at least tried to post some negatives. Also could really only use one thing for Arenas on who is better, and it was scoring.