- Thread starter
- #21
Phil The Thrill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2009
- Messages
- 12,785
- Reaction score
- 218
Yes, but if i wasnt drunk i could do an easy scan of debatable gold glove winners with shitty metrics.
I'm a robotCameronCrazy06 said:and I think you're putting way too much weight into a number (or two) to tell you whether or not he's a good defender. Watch him play. There's a reason he's a four time gold glover.
youre drunk at 9:30 in the morning?.ptt81 said:Yes, but if i wasnt drunk i could do an easy scan of debatable gold glove winners with shitty metrics.
The point is, neither is absolute. You can't just point to defensive metrics and boom, he's a sub par defender. They aren't absolute like some stat-heads seem to think. Unfortunately, we live in an era where people seem to think they can get all the knowledge they need about a player from a few numbers..ptt81 said:Yes, but if i wasnt drunk i could do an easy scan of debatable gold glove winners with shitty metrics.
Not really. I find in general Red Sox fans doucheselcheato said:All Sox stick together