Phil The Thrill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2009
- Messages
- 12,785
- Reaction score
- 218
https://twitter.com/BNightengale/status/759775650521636868
This makes absolutely zero sense
This makes absolutely zero sense
He's a FA after 2017 and not being the starter at C would hurt his valuevideofreak8 said:Indians are very high on Gomes despite him struggling at the plate this year. He'd still be playing almost every day in 2017 just not as a catcher. Oh well.
He's scared of a little competition.
All he had to do was beat out a guy who was hitting .170 this year before going on the DL.BrewCrewFan said:He's a FA after 2017 and not being the starter at C would hurt his value
yes it is, and its very common, it gives them incentive to agree to the trade, its usually a guarentee of options picked up or declined etc, sometimes they just rework the deal to give them more money etc.LeafKiller said:Why would the Indians do that? There's a written contract and that dictates the terms.
Plus is that even allowed under the CBA?
id take note in it as i don't want to pay as much now viewing him as a rental....seeing that he wants more than 5M next year to be traded makes sense to me as a gmvideofreak8 said:If I was a team looking at Lucroy before all this I don't know if I would have the same interest. Asked to have his club option removed. Was scared to have an open competition. He says he wants to win but obviously doesn't have his priorities straight when it comes to that. I'm not saying he has any less value but it's definitely something I would take note of if I was a GM.
teams agree so they don't void contracts, though sometimes they just do it to make the players happy (salvador Perez of the royals)LeafKiller said:I know reworking options is allowed.
Unsure about changing financial terms or why a team would even agree to.
which is why he just asked it to be removed, though they could afford it, it just isnt worth paying that much for 2 months of him and theyd need to sell him on the area before hed agree to an extensionLeafKiller said:With the Indians being a budgeted team, I can't imagine that being viable.
Which is what I've been sayingFTC said:which is why he just asked it to be removed, though they could afford it, it just isnt worth paying that much for 2 months of him and theyd need to sell him on the area before hed agree to an extension