Gordon for Pierce and Bradley?

[bosoxlover12]

8-12ppg plus good defense still doesnt do it for me. i cant believe youd rather want 8-12ppg.... 8-12ppg

as someone who wouldnt be a top 3 scoring option, 12ppg is solid. if he were more focused on offense, he'd get higher, maybe to like 17ppg at most. but thats not who he is

 

[Pugz]

no, hes not that type of scorer. honestly all hes good for is defense and its not the same game where thats what helps you win. you need to be a two-way player.

 

[Pugz]

the fact you mentioned that low of points per game makes him sound horrible, fyi.

 

[jonathanlambert33]

gah

 

[bosoxlover12]

he's still developing his shot. he had some awful coaching at UofTexas, set him back for a few years.
 
 
He was #1 in the 2009 ESPN 100, ahead of Demarcus Cousins, John Wall, Derrick Favors, etc. Its not like im taking about Jordan Crawford, who will be a role playing shooter for his whole career. Bradley is legit, and I'd much rather have someone with real potential over someone who's already peaked at his game

 

[PG24]

There is absolutely no way that the C's should consider moving Avery Bradley, who in my opinion is a top-3 defensive NBA perimeter player for an injury risk like Eric Gordon. I love Gordon's ability when he's healthy, but let's face the facts...he just hasn't been healthy throughout his career. Pierce probably will be gone at the beginning of next season, but they should not even consider moving Bradley.

 

[elcheato]

If you're that concerned with losing a top defender, just sign Tony Allen in the off-season.

 

[bosoxlover12]

I would love Tony back in Boston, but I don't think he leaves Memphis