- Thread starter
- #1
This I agree with. Lurie went from being convinced to give a relatively unproven pro coach control over his roster.......to deciding it was a bad move, in less than a year. I think Chip had it in his head that he was going to run a hurry up, spread-type of offense very similar to what Bradford and Murray ran at Oklahoma. What Chip fails to realize is college kids have much different motivation than professional athletes do.BNC said:As bad as the moves he made were, and most were awful, if you're gonna give him full control you can't fire him after just one year, that's not fair
I don't think it has as much to do with motivation as much as it has to do with the fact that you can't just take players with some talent, plug them into a system and have it be effective like he could do in college. It takes good players with a system built around their skills to be successful in the pros. It's difficult to just pick and choose athletes for a system in the pros because the talent pool is much more limited whereas in college he's got a nation of high school athletes to pick from. Oh and Ryan Mathews or Shady McCoy were better fits for his system as well.Flint said:This I agree with. Lurie went from being convinced to give a relatively unproven pro coach control over his roster.......to deciding it was a bad move, in less than a year. I think Chip had it in his head that he was going to run a hurry up, spread-type of offense very similar to what Bradford and Murray ran at Oklahoma. What Chip fails to realize is college kids have much different motivation than professional athletes do.
That's what happens when you give a coach too much powerPumped Up Kicks said:Chip was an absolute joke. He did pretty solid in his first season, but then after that he started to ruin the team.
& that's what happensPumped Up Kicks said:He literally had more power than he deserved.