cunninlynguists

[B.Rich]

 

[mg91]

Needs depth and lighting. Perhaps some better text as well.

 

[B.Rich]

Needs depth and lighting. Perhaps some better text as well.

Thanks. To be honest, in all fairness. I think this is the type of sig that should go without lighting. Its more of a rough/grunge/simple looking signature. There isn't any room for lighting to make a flowing appearance. I kinda like how I kept it simple with the depth. There is a lot of inversion in this signature and I didn't want it too messy. The text, I can agree with you on that.

 

[mg91]

Fair enough. You posted this for some CnC, and I just gave the best comments I could to make this sig look better as I would see it.

 

[Oiler35]

I like how the yellow gives the bland black and white some pop. Very nice work.

 

[Pugz]

some dodging on the face wouldnt actually be too bad. but the text could just be bigger. i like the yellow though, solid work all around.