After Andrew Luck...

[kam.]

Also, What about Dan Persa? Dude jumped out to me last year before his injury. Could be a Matt Schaub type QB in the league.

 

[swoosh]

Just my perception.

haha

 

[kam.]

haha

:thumbsup:

 

[swoosh]

:headsmack:

 

[kam.]

:headsmack:

So lemme guess.. because you see it.. its right?

Everybody has their own opinion about shit.

 

[swoosh]

So lemme guess.. because you see it.. its right?

Everybody has their own opinion about shit.

It's not just me seeing it. It's practically everyone seeing it.

How do you even come to the perception that he doesn't put a team on his back? I mean, seriously, wtf? lol

 

[kam.]

It's not just me seeing it. It's practically everyone seeing it.

How do you even come to the perception that he doesn't put a team on his back? I mean, seriously, wtf? lol

His team has did what? Oh wait.. Nothing.

Everytime I watch Barkley I come away unimpressed. I never really got the hype with the kid. Ever.

 

[The Young One]

His team has did what? Oh wait.. Nothing.

Everytime I watch Barkley I come away unimpressed. I never really got the hype with the kid. Ever.

He plays at USC....that right there is gonna get you hype.

 

[kam.]

He plays at USC....that right there is gonna get you hype.

USC hasn't been relevant in years.

 

[swoosh]

His team has did what? Oh wait.. Nothing.

Everytime I watch Barkley I come away unimpressed. I never really got the hype with the kid. Ever.

I'm still waiting for you to give me a valid reason for your perception of him not having "it" or "putting a team on his back."

 

[swoosh]

USC hasn't been relevant in years.

They still get hype. It's USC. What do you expect?

 

[kam.]

I'm still waiting for you to give me a valid reason for your perception of him not having "it" or "putting a team on his back."

Are you serious right now?

Very few QBs in the NFL have the It factor.

Andrew Luck is the only one in the draft that has it.

 

[swoosh]

Are you serious right now?

Very few QBs in the NFL have the It factor.

Andrew Luck is the only one in the draft that has it.

And you're basing this off what? Why doesn't he have it?

 

[kam.]

And you're basing this off what? Why doesn't he have it?

Because I've watched him? Just the way he carries himself.. I dont see the It factor..

You act like you're the only person here to watch him.

 

[TTN2810]

What's your definition of the it factor? On field play? Off field attitude? Confidence?

 

[swoosh]

Because I've watched him? Just the way he carries himself.. I dont see the It factor..

You act like you're the only person here to watch him.

Do you realize how stupid you sound right now? You're throwing out random claims that don't fit Barkley whatsoever.

I get it, you don't like Barkley, but he has all the "it" traits. The leadership, demeanor, smarts, IQ, etc.

Of course I'm not the only person here to watch him, but I've seen a shitload of him.

 

[kam.]

What's your definition of the it factor? On field play? Off field attitude? Confidence?

Just the way he handles himself period.. all of that into one.

If Barkley had the it factor people wouldn't be say he'd bust.

 

[TTN2810]

Do you realize how stupid you sound right now? You're throwing out random claims that don't fit Barkley whatsoever.

I get it, you don't like Barkley, but he has all the "it" traits. The leadership, demeanor, smarts, IQ, etc.

Of course I'm not the only person here to watch him, but I've seen a shitload of him.

That's what she said.

 

[kam.]

Do you realize how stupid you sound right now? You're throwing out random claims that don't fit Barkley whatsoever.

I get it, you don't like Barkley, but he has all the "it" traits. The leadership, demeanor, smarts, IQ, etc.

Of course I'm not the only person here to watch him, but I've seen a shitload of him.

Well apparently... anybody that doesn't agree with you is "Stupid"

Surprised I haven't pulled the "Sample Size" card on you for Barkley. You know in your eyes, you need atleast 10 years to say something is legit.

 

[swoosh]

Well apparently... anybody that doesn't agree with you is "Stupid"

Surprised I haven't pulled the "Sample Size" card on you for Barkley. You know in your eyes, you need atleast 10 years to say something is legit.

I couldn't care less if someone agrees or not. Most people don't when it comes to prospects. However, you've yet to make any sense and have just thrown out a bunch of random claims that don't fit Barkley one bit.

You wanna go back to sample size? Where the Jags > Steelers because they had the better record after one game? How's that working out for you? lol