- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
- Messages
- 31,527
- Reaction score
- 876
I voted for Klay. Harden is amazing offensively, but the fact that his teammates don't like him is a major red flag
Paulius33 said:Defense is 50% of the game
DependsBNC said:
Sure, but offense is more important
True or not, Klay is a flat out better overall playerBNC said:
Sure, but offense is more important
Depends on the surrounding roster. Klay couldn't carry the Rockets like Harden did last year, and Harden wouldn't be as good of an option on the WarriorsCameronCrazy06 said:True or not, Klay is a flat out better overall player
A defender can only take away one player, whereas one player can be responsible for most of the bucketsPaulius33 said:Depends
A great defender can take away all those bucketsBNC said:A defender can only take away one player, whereas one player can be responsible for most of the buckets
thats not trueBNC said:A defender can only take away one player, whereas one player can be responsible for most of the buckets
To be fair, the rockets roster was incredibly flawed last year. I look at it this way: if I'm drafting a team to win one game tomorrow, who am I taking?BNC said:Depends on the surrounding roster. Klay couldn't carry the Rockets like Harden did last year, and Harden wouldn't be as good of an option on the Warriors
bosoxlover12 said:I like Harden's abilities as a ball handler, passer, and his nature to attack the rim and get to the FT line
I love Klay, but I feel that he's a little overrated until he proves he can lead a team on a consistent basis (which he never well on this GS team). Only 8% of his 3pt attempts were non-assisted, where as Harden was at 47.9%. His assist percentage was at 9.8%, compared to Harden's 35.4%. Klay gets his numbers inflated due to playing off ball so often, where as Harden did really everything for Houston. There isn't much to say if Klay had a ball-submissive PG like Patrick Beverley that he'd put up the numbers at the efficiency he did.
The main argument against Harden is his defense, but to be honest I think its because he checked out last year. His team was trash and he had almost no help -- he checked out when his team wasn't helping on offense or defense, so he decided to put his energy on offense and put up 29/7.5/6. His defensive metrics in 2014-15 was actually pretty good
Klay is the better role player teammate and a better choice for a supporting cast role with another superstar. If you have your chance at one of these guys to put with the rest of your mediocre team, I might go Harden.
It's a bit of an exaggeration of the truthPapa Pugzo said:thats not true
If that's the case it depends on how the rest of my roster is constructed, you can cover up 1 bad defender, and you're not gonna go far without a guy who can createCameronCrazy06 said:To be fair, the rockets roster was incredibly flawed last year. I look at it this way: if I'm drafting a team to win one game tomorrow, who am I taking?
For me, I'm absolutely taking Klay.
For example no one would ever give Tony Allen a max contract, but Harden would receive max contracts from over half the teams in the league. I'd say those two are pretty much polar opposites of each other in terms of talents, no?BNC said:
Sure, but offense is more important
I don't think that's a fair comparisonBNC said:For example no one would ever give Tony Allen a max contract, but Harden would receive max contracts from over half the teams in the league. I'd say those two are pretty much polar opposites of each other in terms of talents, no?
What would you say is more appropriate, because that's about the best I could come up with. One is an excellent offensive player and a negative defensive player, the other is a negative offensive player and an excellent defensive playerCameronCrazy06 said:I don't think that's a fair comparison