- Thread starter
- #1,041
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2011
- Messages
- 18,967
- Reaction score
- 460
Nick Foles can not lose. What a fucking ride.
Quite honestly, it feels like the team plays with more urgency because they know Foles is limited compared to Carson. It's rather upsetting to watch, to be honest. That being said, Philadelphia's success is Carson's success. If people are truly thinking that there's a debate between the 2, Carson doesn't throw those bad interceptions today. He throws a better ball on the first INT that Smith doesn't get to and likely doesn't even give Jackson a chance at the second INT.bosoxlover12 said:I wonder how BWare feels that the Eagles are better without Wentz playing
Hurricane Season said:That's the trickiest game of all wildcard matchups. I have no idea what to expect.
Kind of surprised the Eagles are getting that many points, though.
Paulius said:Took the eagles +6.5 and the under, got that
Then 4th q in play live over 12.5
Got all that but the bears fucking lost
Whoever that kicker is he better not be on the team next year
He had one fucing job
If you asked people in 2001, theyd say the $100M Bledsoe is more talented and an overall better QB than his backup, but that backup just always shows up and wins gamesBwareDWare94 said:Quite honestly, it feels like the team plays with more urgency because they know Foles is limited compared to Carson. It's rather upsetting to watch, to be honest. That being said, Philadelphia's success is Carson's success. If people are truly thinking that there's a debate between the 2, Carson doesn't throw those bad interceptions today. He throws a better ball on the first INT that Smith doesn't get to and likely doesn't even give Jackson a chance at the second INT.
All that being said, their season is effectively over. They are not coming within 10 points of New Orleans at New Orleans. Game might be over at half time.
Especially if Josh Adams can't go. Smallwood will get eaten alive.
But that's that. Hopefully there isn't a real Wentz/Foles debate. Wentz is obviously a better QB. If people want to worry about early-career injuries, I say look how durable Matt Stafford has been after several injury-plagued years. Not worried about Carson being injury prone yet.
I wouldnt argue that Foles is better than wentz, but Id definitely argue the eagles dont need Wentz and shouldnt pay him top dollarBwareDWare94 said:To be fair, Bledsoe absolutely was more talented at the time. Brady wasn't what he was from day 1. He developed into it.
hes already had two big injuries in the NFL; hes gonna need that first BIG paycheckBwareDWare94 said:I can see Wentz going the Brady route and inking team-friendly contracts or restructuring regularly like Brady/Aikmen. Not concerned about a person of his character quality sabotaging his team's cap future.