- Thread starter
- #2,921
Paulius
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2015
- Messages
- 40,727
- Reaction score
- 432
Back to OKC? [emoji102]JZsportswhiz said:Maybe KD sacks up and heads elsewhere because he has his 2 rings
Back to OKC? [emoji102]JZsportswhiz said:Maybe KD sacks up and heads elsewhere because he has his 2 rings
Only if hes willing to take a backseat to #TheAlphaPaulius said:Back to OKC? [emoji102]
No way in hell Silver should have vetoed that, it sets a terrible precedent and is something he should be fired forTeagz said:Has anyone ever won back to back titles this easily? How many in a row can they win? 4? 5? Nobody has given them any competition, and they aren't gonna get any until/unless Tatum and Brown make the leap for the Celtics in the near future. Injuries are really the only thing that can stop them.
Silver should have vetoed the Durant move. Basketball reasons exemplified.
Whoah hey now why so upset with Kevin Durant?Mexi said:KD took a paycut like a bitch
He wont go back
Actually agreeBNC said:No way in hell Silver should have vetoed that, it sets a terrible precedent and is something he should be fired for
Cavs Warriors would produce much better ratings than Cavs Celticsbosoxlover12 said:warriors cavs wont even be close. like, imagine what happened to the cavs in game 1 v boston... thats EVERY game against golden state
you watch basketball for the wrong reasons man. a celtics warriors series would produce the best games among whats possible. boston is scrappy enough to make things close enough.
lebron getting smacked by the warriors is nothing new and expected. i wont be watching those games, and ratings WOULD be down
Agreed again, wowBNC said:Cavs Warriors would produce much better ratings than Cavs Celtics
Don't veto trades either, only once was it vetoed because the league owned one of the teams involved so it wasn't actually the league vetoing it but rather the teams ownersPaulius said:Actually agree
Never veto FAcy signings
Agreed, my god we on a rollBNC said:Don't veto trades either, only once was it vetoed because the league owned one of the teams involved so it wasn't actually the league vetoing it but rather the teams owners
Shit, umm... Russ shouldn't have won MVP last yearPaulius said:Agreed again, wow
marking this day in my calendar #OneOfThosrDays
I'm not sure CP3 and Kobe would mesh personality wise, or even Basketball wise but he seems to have done fine with Harden so who knows. But I doubt they were beating the Heat that yearPaulius said:Agreed, my god we on a role
That veto left me salty, Kobe woulda won more
Ill let playoffC take care of this oneBNC said:Shit, umm... Russ shouldn't have won MVP last year
phew that's better
That was the season mavs won iirc, right?BNC said:I'm not sure CP3 and Kobe would mesh personality wise, or even Basketball wise but he seems to have done fine with Harden so who knows. But I doubt they were beating the Heat that year
the worst thing kd did wasnt signing with gswPaulius said:Whoah hey now why so upset with Kevin Durant?
Yea I dont get the point of saving the owners money when you’re racking in all these rings and money for themMexi said:the worst thing kd did wasnt signing with gsw
It's taking paycuts