- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 60,151
- Reaction score
- 2,039
LolDJT said:man its not all about the money haha. Who cares if its vet min??? Not him, not a lot of other players too.
LolDJT said:man its not all about the money haha. Who cares if its vet min??? Not him, not a lot of other players too.
Why is that funny? There are loads of players who have taken less money for a situation.CameronCrazy06 said:
Theres two cases:DJT said:Why is that funny? There are loads of players who have taken less money for a situation.
But thats not to say that any other team interested in him didn't offer him more. Yes he was fringy due to injuries, but Rose wants to hoop. If a team offered him more than min, but said, hey you'll be 3rd string and probably won't play, he'll go to Thibs who he likes and play there for less.CameronCrazy06 said:Theres two cases:
Veterans voluntarily signing for the minimum with a contending team to try and win a ring (I.e. David West)
Or a low risk flyer on fringe players who cant get a better offer anywhere else.
Which category do you think Rose was in?
Thats fine. Thats why it was low risk for Minnesota. Im just arguing DJT saying being on the veteran minimum isnt a big deal.Paulius said:CC you smarter than this
His situation was that he was constantly injured in new york and Cleveland
Not disagreeing with that.Paulius said:Teams just dont wanna risk signing injury prone players to a long contracts which is understandable
Doesnt mean that a HEALTHY Rose dosny belong in the league
Really? I dont see the button on tapatalk :/CameronCrazy06 said:We can do negative rep now?
you dont think drose would have taken more than the minimum if he was offered the chance?DJT said:Why is that funny? There are loads of players who have taken less money for a situation.
Depends on how much more, I don't think he chooses a worse situation for $1M more, that doesn't make a difference to someone with over $20M coming in annually from Adidas, if it were like $6/$7M more, then year he's gonna take the money cause it would be stupid not tobosoxlover12 said:you dont think drose would have taken more than the minimum if he was offered the chance?
so again, to cc and my point -- drose was not getting a good nba contract from any team (also he's making $8.5M from Adidas this year, just semantics). whether its the league $2.4M minimum, or a team offering him a whopping $4M per year, its nothing substantial because sans-yesterday he hasnt shown to be worth more than thatBNC said:Depends on how much more, I don't think he chooses a worse situation for $1M more, that doesn't make a difference to someone with over $20M coming in annually from Adidas, if it were like $6/$7M more, then year he's gonna take the money cause it would be stupid not to
It depends on what the situation was. If it was a team that had several good PGs and probably wouldn't give him any minutes, like just a mentor role, no playing, then yes I think he'd take the min.bosoxlover12 said:you dont think drose would have taken more than the minimum if he was offered the chance?
https://streamable.com/e/prmwxBNC said:Depends on how much more, I don't think he chooses a worse situation for $1M more, that doesn't make a difference to someone with over $20M coming in annually from Adidas, if it were like $6/$7M more, then year he's gonna take the money cause it would be stupid not to