- Joined
- Jun 11, 2008
- Messages
- 67,842
- Reaction score
- 2,208
Josh Gordon and Ricardo Louis
bosoxlover12 said:I don't see why the TE wouldn't count? Kelce's putting up the same numbers that Thielen is
Like you don't hear Denver this week stating "New England's #2 and #3 WRs this week are Amendola and Dorsett, easy matchup for Talib and Roby!" because the behemoth of Rob Gronkowski still exists. Gronk and Kelce line up out wide as often as Diggs and Thielen do (since they play a lot of slot work as well) so I really don't see an argument to not include them for best receiving pair.
And its easy to say Edelman/Cooks > Thielen/Diggs, because Edelman is better than Thielen and Cooks is better than Diggs lol
Diggs and Thielen don’t have been doing this longer than part of one season and generally stay healthy.bosoxlover12 said:Hill/Kelce and Cooks/Gronkowski are better than Diggs/Thielen, and Edelman/Cooks is better when Jules isn't ded
Crabtree/Cooper is up there too. AB and JuJu are looking that way soon as well
elcheato said:It's Antonio Brown and Juju just because of how much better Antonio Brown is than both Thielen and Diggs
AE. said:Juju isn’t th 2nd beat receiver on his own team
bruhBwareDWare94 said:
Yeah, AB is better, but it's not that big of a gap. Noticeable, not massive.
bosoxlover12 said:bruh
First off, if any Viking WR is top 10 its Thielen not Diggs (neither are), and second off AB is in a class of his own along with Julio...BwareDWare94 said:
Bruh what? The gap between 1-10 at the WR position in the NFL is not that drastic. I'd say Diggs is top 10 at this point.
Foreman said:Jordy arguably tier 2 with Rodgers at QB. Marvin Jones and Golden Tate > Vikings WRs
Are you high?Foreman said:Jordy arguably tier 2 with Rodgers at QB. Marvin Jones and Golden Tate > Vikings WRs