- Thread starter
- #4,601
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Messages
- 127,713
- Reaction score
- 2,100
theyre like third cousinsbosoxlover12 said:that emeka is cousins with jah? yes.
theyre like third cousinsbosoxlover12 said:that emeka is cousins with jah? yes.
How exactly will 20 teams never have any young players to get excited about? Most of the teams that don't will be fielding playoff teamselcheato said:Because 20 of the teams would never have any young players to get excited about, and franchise values would plummet as attendance fell across the board
bosoxlover12 said:thats an awful idea
The second part is a good point.elcheato said:This idea is not possible without eliminating the cap altogether (which the owners will never go for), or nearly every rookie would be playing for the minimum, with the exception of maybe 4 guys.
It's also not possible because doing this would potentially lower the salaries of the veterans without a massive increase in the cap again (which to reiterate, will not fly with the owners without a massive lockout), the players union wouldn't allow this either.
Oh I don't care about that either, but it can be a bit of an issue when teams are better off losing games than trying to winelcheato said:And this obsession with ending "tanking" is hilarious. A bunch of old ass writers/TV personalities get upset and the league has to make changes. Who cares?