2013 NFL Gameday Thread

[BwareDWare94]

Thompkins and Dobson make this team so dangerous. Forget Amendola. 
 
I also love the combination of Ridley/Blount. Blount is so underrated. 

 

[bosoxlover12]

Thompkins and Dobson make this team so dangerous. Forget Amendola. 
 
I also love the combination of Ridley/Blount. Blount is so underrated. 

Uhhh....
 
 
And Blount can't run at all. He's just strong. Ridley+Vereen/Bolden is much better

 

[BwareDWare94]

This is only a game because of two absolute BS penalties on Barry Church. My God, if Dallas loses this game, that can't be ignored. Just pure bullshit.

 

[elcheato]

The refs are screwing everyone's favorite team in the same week, EVERY WEEK!

 

[WHO-DEY-BENGALS_18]

Everyone must want the replacements back 

 

[RipCity32]

Fauria>>>>>

Also Levy has turned into an absolute stud.

 

[Hurricane Season]

I think it's time for Cousins.

 

[BwareDWare94]

The refs are screwing everyone's favorite team in the same week, EVERY WEEK!

 
Those two penalties gave Washington 10 extra points. That doesn't happen every week.

 

[Fuhgeddaboudit]

Romo had like 170 yards and 1 TD? How did they win?

 

[jonathanlambert33]

Everyone must want the replacements back

They would call a better game than what the ones in the Saints-Pats games did

 

[jonathanlambert33]

BTW, the league should just get rid of holding penalties because it is way to inconsistent of a call.

 

[Fuhgeddaboudit]

So then everyone can hold whenever they want to?

 

[jonathanlambert33]

There is holding on the majority of plays that isn't called.

 

[BwareDWare94]

So then everyone can hold whenever they want to?

 
No, but it should have to be absolutely egregious, i.e. prevented a sack, a tackle, a reception, a TD. etc. There is no reason to call something that "might be" holding or happened away from the play. Too many holds are called where the analysts calling the game watch the replay and say, "What?"

 

[jonathanlambert33]

No, but it should have to be absolutely egregious, i.e. prevented a sack, a tackle, a reception, a TD. etc. There is no reason to call something that "might be" holding or happened away from the play. Too many holds are called where the analysts calling the game watch the replay and say, "What?"

I was thinking if you bring them to the ground or something.

 

[Fuhgeddaboudit]

 
No, but it should have to be absolutely egregious, i.e. prevented a sack, a tackle, a reception, a TD. etc. There is no reason to call something that "might be" holding or happened away from the play. Too many holds are called where the analysts calling the game watch the replay and say, "What?"

 
Preventing a sack, preventing a tackle, preventing a reception...sometimes it's going to be really hard to judge whether or not there was a prevention of any of those things from a minor hold. 
 
It'll be more inconsistent if that was the case, IMO.

 

[elcheato]

Broncos win an NFL game by 16, still undefeated.
 
ESPN: "Is there reason for concern in Denver?"

 

[Fuhgeddaboudit]

Broncos win an NFL game by 16, still undefeated.
 
ESPN: "Is there reason for concern in Denver?"

 
They did not say that...gtfo here?
 
LOL

 

[Big Bid'Ness]

Broncos win an NFL game by 16, still undefeated.
 
ESPN: "Is there reason for concern in Denver?"

 
If they would of said Defensive Wise, ball handling wise, O-Line wise, injury wise i would of understood lol.

 

[NV]

Broncos win an NFL game by 16, still undefeated.
 
ESPN: "Is there reason for concern in Denver?"

Got killed in the spread hahaha