- Joined
- Feb 15, 2009
- Messages
- 27,130
- Reaction score
- 1,228
Bravo, Mr. Wilkerson
I said that last week, and they were gifted a win.The Guid said:You did say JEST...so, you were technically correct.
bosoxlover12 said:That brawl>
noooooooooHurricane said:Bob Sanders has been reincarnated as Danny Amendola
Probably, but he didn't. Him not going out of bounds isn't a penalty. It's kind of stupid, but there's nothing egregious about it. Diving at someones knees is though. Regardless of the scenario, you can't do that... especially when the player is already out of bounds.BwareDWare94 said:The late hit on Mangold was just as much Talib's fault as Mangold's. If Aqib had just gone out of bounds, like a normal game ending INT, it never would have happened.
I'm also appalled that the Pats escaped that situation without a single penalty called on him, but leave it to Carl Cheffers to fuck that up. It doesn't matter--the game's over at that point, but that seemed rather unfair.
ExactlyHurricane said:Probably, but he didn't. Him not going out of bounds isn't a penalty. It's kind of stupid, but there's nothing egregious about it. Diving at someones knees is though. Regardless of the scenario, you can't do that... especially when the player is already out of bounds.
For what could we had a penalty called on us? For intercepting a pass and while stupidly, trying to advance the ball? By being pushed by DBrick?BwareDWare94 said:The late hit on Mangold was just as much Talib's fault as Mangold's. If Aqib had just gone out of bounds, like a normal game ending INT, it never would have happened.
I'm also appalled that the Pats escaped that situation without a single penalty called on him, but leave it to Carl Cheffers to fuck that up. It doesn't matter--the game's over at that point, but that seemed rather unfair.