- Joined
- Apr 22, 2006
- Messages
- 27,416
- Reaction score
- 302
I don't see why the NBA isn't pushing to sell the team more? Or are they?
it wouldnt be straight upTry to get Amar'e maybe...um...try Blake Griffin maybe, Kevin Love...all the good/young bigs in the league...I just think Bynum for Dwight straight up is absurd. There should be more packaged.
jerry west wasnt in memphis when it happenedMexi it's not about the Lakers blowing any series. It's about the NBA running the NO Hornets and taking a trade package that is sub-par compared to CP3's talents in order to benefit the Lakers.
When the Lakers got Pau for shit, I thought it was just Jerry West doing his old team a favor. But now I think there might be an agenda.
Mavs aren't a threat? Didn't we learn this lesson last year...potentially chris paul
kobe's on the downslope, but with dwight, it gives the lakers a little bit bigger window
west is down. only threat as of today is OKC
better than being in the east with miami and chicago and the knicks
one and done and you know thatMavs aren't a threat? Didn't we learn this lesson last year...
Thank you for confirming it being the #1 most lopsided trade in NBA history.jerry west wasnt in memphis when it happened
and you saw the playoffs. look what the grizzlies got
darrell arthur, greivis, marc gasol, money for ZBo
The Mavericks without Chandler are still a top 3 team in the West...one and done and you know that
especially with no tyson
and i did day "right now"
they could still make moves
lopsided for memphis?Thank you for confirming it being the #1 most lopsided trade in NBA history.
fine add themThe Mavericks without Chandler are still a top 3 team in the West...
Lol no. You act like Grievis Vasquez and Darrell Arthur make that trade worth it for Memphis. Marc is nothing close to his brother and they didn't GET Zach Randolph in that trade so IDK why you always bring that up.lopsided for memphis?