- Joined
- Jun 10, 2006
- Messages
- 21,817
- Reaction score
- 338
Id hate to lose Nate and Lee without something in return for at least one...
I would love that.NY Times
<3
Farmar and Ammo for NateId hate to lose Nate and Lee without something in return for at least one...
I agree.Why would the Knicks trade for two useless players, they'd be better off just letting Nate leave for nothing then getting that.
thats Mexi, but yeah same thing I thought. lolLmao i love that sig dez, it says the missing piece, they already won a championship nothing was missing lol
Both are IR playersarticle says lakers are interested
2 players for 1, then i think they would go after Lee(not sure)
both could work with an up tempo style, and if not, they expire in 2010 which is what they would love
so whatBoth are IR players
EXTREMELY loldez, you pumped to have Darko for a season? lol
I'm sure they could get something better then two scrubs for Nate. He's not going to LA, sorryso what
they would expire in 2010 when they go after someone
how?? lolits my sig, and it's like 3 years old lol
artest wasnt coming eitherI'm sure they could get something better then two scrubs for Nate. He's not going to LA, sorry