So he gets everyone involved and that results in a 12 point lead, then when the lead is down to 2 he figures the best thing to do is not what got them the 12 point lead in the first place, but chuck? Does that make sense to you?
I think most media outlets were asking the question of wether or not they were in trouble. I remember hearing reports of the Warriors laughing and joking around in the locker room after going down 2-1