Search results

So you're just never gonna give a decent argument on why Bortles is better than Kaep?    Is it cause none exists or that it's just too much work?

I saw that, that blows. Giants better tank now and try and get one of those QBs to help Odell out (I don't know if they're even any good though)

Hopefully Odell just sprained his ankle and didn't break it. The league is so much more entertaining when he's playing

Bortles is still trash, the team does everything possible to not have him throwing the ball. Cutler too

Big Ben is washed

Never said he wouldn't be, he absolutely will

By defense being a thing that these guys play.   Even though that's not what I've said

I mean, there’s not any evidence to suggest the contrary, at least you’d have to say it’s TBD

Should be 0

You're salty cause you don't like Harden and are a Thunder fan. It wasn't dirty at all

Coaches are still selecting the reserves

The guy knew what he was talking about I take it?

What is that even supposed to mean?

Robinson isn't 8 feet tall, he can't help Bortles be more accurate or make better decisions

I prefer that the league doesn't hold the hands of the teams that suck at their job, in what other line of work do you get rewarded for being bad at your job?   And it wouldn't necessarily increase/decrease parity, you'd still have several teams that know what they're doing always competing...

Again I think you are showing that you don't understand the concept that SVG proposed. Or the concept of a free market and market correction. By that I mean look at the free agent deals last year and compare them to this year, that's a market correction

Except the market will regulate itself, in a short period of time teams are going to know what a rookie should cost them, in that case some will be underpaid and some will be overpaid, kinda how the league is now. And this is exactly why smart management is going to be rewarded and bad...

I said it's not ridiculous to assume he isn't, and it's not.    I'm not talking strictly about talent, I'm talking effectiveness as an NBA player

Except not all rookies turn out the same, and most aren't good players for a while, so you're gonna have a roster with a bunch of young guys making a ton of money. Smart managers are going to sign the good rookies or rookies to deals that reflect their performance

The Warriors and Cavs would have been able to sign Markelle Fultz with their non existent cap space?    "If you reward only good teams or "smart" management as youre saying, what will happen to the small market teams?"   What?