It’s wondering the same thing, I think it has to do with agents bribing players, I don’t think there’s anything illegal about the school paying the kids though
Can the schools repay it or does it have to be the athletes? And in the article above the schools didn’t do anything wrong, the players took loans from agents, there’s nothing to prove they took money from the schools (even though they probably did)
NCAA will let the FBI conduct their investigation the decide to vacate some wins, I doubt they do much from this. They’d lose too much money by suspending a bunch of teams
Every team plays the same 58 games regardless of conference, so there’s only 24 games that differ. Among those they play the same caliber opponent for probably like 18-20 of them. So yea obviously he’d rather do that but the difference in schedule difficulty isn’t that drastic
Difference between east and west for scheduling isn’t that drastic. It’s been estimated that playing in one conference or the other is only worth about 2 wins either way